Scenario is handover on S1AP, data forwarding is enabled, and
the Source ENB is forwarding DL PDCP packets to EPC(SGWU)
with PDCP SN included. SGWU is also forwarding these packets
to the Target ENB.
However the PDCP SN is not present in the forwarded packets
from SGWU to Target ENB.
I modified this part, and there was the same problem in 5GC, fixed it as well.
A lot of code in GTP-U has been modified,
so if you have any problems, please let us know right away.
TS23.007 17.4.1
19A PFCP based restart procedures
After a PFCP entity has restarted, it shall immediately update all local Recovery Time Stamps and shall clear all remote
Recovery Time Stamps. When peer PFCP entities information is available, i.e. when the PFCP Association is still alive,
the restarted PFCP entity shall send its updated Recovery Time Stamps in a Heartbeat Request message to the peer
PFCP entities before initiating any PFCP session signalling.
* [PFCP] Fix trailing whitespace in message generation files
* [PFCP] message gen: Support multiple URR ID IEs in Create PDR group
* [PFCP] Support associating multiple URRs to a PDR
According to 3GPP TS 29.244:
"""
A PDR shall contain:
- zero, one or more URRs, which contains instructions related to traffic measurement and reporting.
"""
* [PFCP] Fix trailing whitespace
* [PFCP] Fix wrong endianess enc of some URR values
u32 tlvs are already converted to big endian automatically. Manually
doing so ends up in double conversion and hence in wrong endianness
being sent over the wire.
Similar issue was also fixed recently in the PFCP decoding path.
Related: https://github.com/open5gs/open5gs/issues/1349
When connecting to the UPF port for the PFCP protocol (8805) and sending
an association setup request followed by a session establishment request
with a PDI Network Instance set to ‘internet’, it causes a stack corruption
to occur.
So, ogs_fqdn_parse() fixed.
* Flow-Description use 'to assigned' in Gx Interface
* Support SDF Filter ID
* Support F-TEID's Choose
* BAR(Buffering) is added in PFCP session
* Default Apply Action uses NOCP|BUFF
So far, no operation was performed when Error Indication was received
from eNodeB. For that reason, I solved #568 issues by controlling
the MME to prevent this from happening.
Now, when GTP-U Error Indication is received, MME and SGW are implemented
to do what they have to do. I hope that the network can be restored
by responding appropriately even if Error Indication occurs.
<DOWNLINK>
RX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
GX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
PFCP : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
RULE : Source <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> Destination <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
TFT : Local <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> REMOTE <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
<UPLINK>
RX : permit in from <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> to <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
GX : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
PFCP : permit out from <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT> to <UE_IP> <UE_PORT>
RULE : Source <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> Destination <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
TFT : Local <UE_IP> <UE_PORT> REMOTE <P-CSCF_RTP_IP> <P-CSCF_RTP_PORT>
- Set the number of UEs in units of AMF/MME instead of gNB/eNB.
- See default value as shown below
Number of UEs per AMF/MME : 4,096
Number of gNB/eNB per AMF/MME : 32
