This commit adds code to send stream deletion events when
unsubscribing non-admin users from private streams and
when unsubscribing guests from public streams since
non-admins cannot access unsubscribed private streams
and guests cannot access unsubscribed public streams.
It was discovered by the Zulip development team that active users who
had previously been subscribed to a stream incorrectly continued being
able to use the Zulip API to access metadata for that stream. As a
result, users who had been removed from a stream, but still had an
account in the organization, could still view metadata for that
stream (including the stream name, description, settings, and an email
address used to send emails into the stream via the incoming email
integration). This potentially allowed users to see changes to a
stream’s metadata after they had lost access to the stream.
This bug was present in all Zulip releases prior to today's Zulip
Server 7.5.
This commit adds new API endpoint to get stream email which is
used by the web-app as well to get the email when a user tries
to open the stream email modal.
The stream email is returned only to the users who have access
to it. Specifically for private streams only subscribed users
have access to its email. And for public streams, all non-guest
users and only subscribed guests have access to its email.
All users can access email of web-public streams.
This commit removes "email_address" field from Subscription objects
and we would instead a new endpoint in next commit to get email
address for stream with proper access check.
This change also fixes the bug where we would include email address
for the unsubscribed private stream as well when user did not have
permission to send message to the stream, and having email allowed
the unsubscribed user to send message to the stream.
Note that the unsubscribed user can still send message to the stream
if the user had noted down the email before being unsubscribed
and the stream token is not changed after unsubscribing the user.
There was a bug in apply_event code where only a stream which
is not private is added to the "never_subscribed" data after
a stream creation event. Instead, it should be added to the
"never_subscribed" data irrespective of permission policy of
the stream as we already send stream creation events only to
those users who can access the stream. Due to the current
bug, private streams were not being added to "never_subscribed"
data in apply_event for admins as well. This commit fixes it
and also makes sure the "never_subscribed" list is sorted
which was not done before and was also a bug.
The bugs mentioned above were unnoticed as the tests did not
cover these cases and this commit also adds tests for those
cases.
The "streams" field in "/register" response did not include web-public
streams for non-admin users but the data for those are eventually
included in the subscriptions data sent using "subscriptions",
"unsubscribed" and "never_subscribed" fields.
This commit adds code to include the web-public streams in "streams"
field as well as everyone can access those and will make the "streams"
data complete.
This works around the `/usr/bin/pg_dump` failure described in the
previous commit. Since we are now calling the appropriately-versioned
`pg_dump` binary directly, it is no longer "necessary", but is added
as a defense-in-depth.
`/usr/bin/pg_dump` on Ubuntu and Debian is actually a tool which
attempts to choose which `pg_dump` binary from all of the
`postgresql-client-*` packages that are installed to run. However,
its logic is confused by passing empty `--host` and `--port` options
-- instead of looking at the running server instance on the server, it
instead assumes some remote host and chooses the highest versioned
`pg_dump` which is installed.
Because Zulip writes binary database backups, they are sensitive to
the version of the client `pg_dump` binary is used -- and the output
may not be backwards compatible. Using a PostgreSQL 16 `pg_dump`
writes archive format 1.15, which cannot be read by a PostgreSQL 15
`pg_restore`.
Zulip does not currently support PostgreSQL 16 as a server. This
means that backups on servers with `postgresql-client-16` installed
did not successfully round-trip Zulip backups -- their backups are
written using PostgreSQL 16's client, and the `pg_restore` chosen on
restore was correctly chosen as the one whose version matched the
server (PostgreSQL 15 or below), and thus did not understand the new
archive format.
Existing `./manage.py backups` taken since `postgresql-client-16` were
installed are thus not directly usable by the `restore-backup` script.
They are not useless, however, since they can theoretically be
converted into a format readable by PostgreSQL 15 -- by importing into
a PostgreSQL 16 instance, and re-dumping with a PostgreSQL 15
`pg_dump`.
Fix this issue by hard-coding path to the binary whose version matches
the version of the server we are connected to. This may theoretically
fail if we are connected to a remote PostgreSQL instance and we do not
have a `postgresql-client` package locally installed which matches the
remote PostgreSQL server's version. However, choosing a matching
version is the only way to ensure that it will be able to be imported
cleanly -- and it is preferable that we fail the backup process rather
than write backups that we cannot easily restore from.
Fixes: #27160.
This fixes a regression introduced in
9954db4b59, where the realm's default
language would be ignored for users created via API/LDAP/SAML,
resulting in all such users having English as their default language.
The API/LDAP/SAML account creation code paths don't have a request,
and thus cannot pull default language from the user's browser.
We have the `realm.default_language` field intended for this use case,
but it was not being passed through the system.
Rather than pass `realm.default_language` through from each caller, we
make the low-level user creation code set this field, as that seems
more robust to the creation of future callers.
Making request a mandatory kwarg avoids confusion about the meaning of
parameters, especially with `request` acquiring the ability to be None
in the upcoming next commit.
This is common in cases where the reverse proxy itself is making
health-check requests to the Zulip server; these requests have no
X-Forwarded-* headers, so would normally hit the error case of
"request through the proxy, but no X-Forwarded-Proto header".
Add an additional special-case for when the request's originating IP
address is resolved to be the reverse proxy itself; in these cases,
HTTP requests with no X-Forwarded-Proto are acceptable.
Previously (with ERROR_REPORTING = True), we’d stuff the entire
traceback of the initial exception into the subject line of an error
email, and then also send a separate email for the JSON 500 response.
Instead, log one error with the standard Django format.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The name and docstring were just wrong, having a UserMessage row isn't
sufficient for having message access and is actually only relevant in a
private stream with private history. The function is only used in a
single place anyway, in bulk_access_messages.
The comment mentioning this function in handle_remove_push_notification
can be tweaked to just not mention any function specifically and just
say why we're not checking message access.
Users who used to be subscribed to a private stream and have been
removed from it since retain the ability to edit messages/topics, and
delete messages that they used to have access to, if other relevant
organization permissions allow these actions. For example, a user may be
able to edit or delete their old messages they posted in such a private
stream. An administrator will be able to delete old messages (that they
had access to) from the private stream.
We fix this by fixing the logic in has_message_access (which lies at the
core of our message access checks - access_message() and
bulk_access_messages())
to not rely on only a UserMessage row for checking access but also
verify stream type and subscription status.
Previously, if a user tried to create a webhook using the Webhooks
plugin in Sentry and used the "Test plugin" to test the webhook,
the server would send a 500 error, even though the integration
worked perfectly. This led users to believe that the integration
was not working.
Fixes#26173.
(cherry picked from commit eb8714c9dc)
This is done to clarify from where this fixture is coming from; as there
are two documented ways to test the integration.
(cherry picked from commit fdc14ee3f0)
Because the third party might not be expecting a 400 from our
webhooks, we now instead use 200 status code for unknown events,
while sending back the error to Sentry. Because it is no longer an error
response, the response type should now be "success".
Fixes#24721.
(cherry picked from commit 84723654c8)
This helps reduce the impact on busy uwsgi processes in case there are
slow timeout failures of Sentry servers. The p99 is less than 300ms,
and p99.9 per day peaks at around 1s, so this will not affect more
than .1% of requests in normal operation.
This is not a complete solution (see #26229); it is merely stop-gap
mitigation.
(cherry picked from commit a076d49be7)
