We added "user_settings" object containing all the user settings in
previous commit. This commit modifies the code to send the existing
setting fields in the top-level object only if user_settings_object
client_capabilities field is False.
This commit adds "user_settings_object" field to
client_capabilities which will be used to determine
if the client needs 'update_display_settings' and
'update_global_notifications' event.
We send a event with type 'user_settings' on updating user's display
and notification settings.
The old event types - 'update_global_notifications' and
'update_display_settings', are still supported for backwards
compatibility.
We do not require separate tests for checking events when changing
"enable_drafts_synchronization" as we already do this in the display
settings test because this setting is included in property_types.
Return zulip_merge_base alongside zulip_version
in `/register`, `/event` and `/server_settings`
endpoint so that the value can be used by other
clients.
These were added at some point in the past, but were not complete, and
it makes sense to document the current feature level as and when they
become available, since clients should not use the drafts endpoints on
older feature levels.
This commit allows to import the following from rocketchat:
* All users
* All public/private channels
* All teams and its public/private channels
* All discussion rooms as topics in their parent channel
* All the messages in all the channels
* All private conversations
* Reactions on messages (except for custom emojis)
* Mentions in messages (except @all, @here mentions)
Previously, we checked for the `enable_offline_email_notifications` and
`enable_offline_push_notifications` settings (which determine whether the
user will receive notifications for PMs and mentions) just before sending
notifications. This has a few problem:
1. We do not have access to all the user settings in the notification
handlers (`handle_missedmessage_emails` and `handle_push_notifications`),
and therefore, we cannot correctly determine whether the notification should
be sent. Checks like the following which existed previously, will, for
example, incorrectly not send notifications even when stream email
notifications are enabled-
```
if not receives_offline_email_notifications(user_profile):
return
```
With this commit, we simply do not enqueue notifications if the "offline"
settings are disabled, which fixes that bug.
Additionally, this also fixes a bug with the "online push notifications"
feature, which was, if someone were to:
* turn off notifications for PMs and mentions (`enable_offline_push_notifications`)
* turn on stream push notifications (`enable_stream_push_notifications`)
* turn on "online push" (`enable_online_push_notifications`)
then, they would still receive notifications for PMs when online.
This isn't how the "online push enabled" feature is supposed to work;
it should only act as a wrapper around the other notification settings.
The buggy code was this in `handle_push_notifications`:
```
if not (
receives_offline_push_notifications(user_profile)
or receives_online_push_notifications(user_profile)
):
return
// send notifications
```
This commit removes that code, and extends our `notification_data.py` logic
to cover this case, along with tests.
2. The name for these settings is slightly misleading. They essentially
talk about "what to send notifications for" (PMs and mentions), and not
"when to send notifications" (offline). This commit improves this condition
by restricting the use of this term only to the database field, and using
clearer names everywhere else. This distinction will be important to have
non-confusing code when we implement multiple options for notifications
in the future as dropdown (never/when offline/when offline or online, etc).
3. We should ideally re-check all notification settings just before the
notifications are sent. This is especially important for email notifications,
which may be sent after a long time after the message was sent. We will
in the future add code to thoroughly re-check settings before sending
notifications in a clean manner, but temporarily not re-checking isn't
a terrible scenario either.
In this commit:
* We update the `UserStatus` model to accept
`AbstractReaction` as a base class so, we can get all the
fields related to store status emoji.
* We update the user status endpoint
(`users/me/status`) to accept status emoji fields.
* We update the user status event to add status emoji
fields.
Co-authored-by: Yash Rathore <33805964+YashRE42@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds can_add_custom_emoji
helper to check whether the user can
add custom emoji or not.
This function will be used further when
add_custom_emoji_policy will be extended
to include all COMMON_POLICY_VALUES.
This commit replaces boolean field add_emoji_by_admins_only with an
integer field add_custom_emoji_policy as we would also add full members
and moderators option for this setting in further commits.
This removes a bunch of non-functional duplicate JavaScript, HTML, and
CSS that was interfering with maintenance on the functional originals,
because it was never clear how to update the duplicates or how to
check that you’d updated the duplicates correctly.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit moves "enter_sends" setting to property_types dict.
With this change, changing enter_sends setting also sends an
event of type "update_display_settings" and thus enables us
to live-update the UI.
Instead of directly changing the `POST` attribute of a request, we
utilize the `HostRequestMock` initializer to produce requests with
different post data.
The decorators require the decorated function to be a valid view
function. This changes the way the mocked view functions and requests
are implemented such that we can invoke view functions without future
type errors.
`export_realm` accepts an HttpRequest as the first argument,
while `self.client_post` conflicts with it. Though the argument is
unused in `export_realm`, we keep it to be compliant with the
view function type.
Of the two other logging mocks left in this file, one checks
a logging call isn't made and another makes sure errors
aren't allowed by raising an exception as a side_effect
to the logger.
