Previously, when a topic is mentioned, the server generated a
permalink using the earliest accessible message of the topic.
This commit updates it to rather use the latest message of the
topic.
Fixes: #32934
Follow up to PR zulip#33097
Also add test cases to make sure a silent mention alone doesn't fetch
group membership, but non-silent mention does and always takes precedence.
To get content access streams for mention.py, we will now use
get_content_access_streams and we have done a lot more other refactors
in this commit around filter_stream_authorization. Mainly making that
function only to be used for adding subscribers and naming it
accordingly.
Previously when system bots used to `#-mention` a private
channel's topics in cases like moving messages of a private
channel, then the #-mentions were not rendered by the
markdown. This was because the system bots did not have
authorization to mention these channels.
This is fixed by passing down an `acting_user` parameter
in code paths involving sending these move message
notifications so that permission of acting_user to mention
the topic is verified for rendering the markdown, rather
than that of the system bot.
This commit converts the links generated by the markdown
of the "#-mention" of topics to permalinks -- the links containing
the "with" narrow operator, the operand being the last message
of the channel and topic of the mention.
Fixes part of #21505
Fixes: #32934
context:
Fetching all users who are members (directly or via sub-groups)
of groups mentioned in one message.
Reduce O(n) queries, where n is the number
of mentioned groups, to a constant of 1 query.
Extend "get_recursive_subgroups_for_groups" functionality to
"get_root_id_annotated_recursive_subgroups_for_groups"
which is the same but keeps track of each group root_id and
annotates it to each group.
Then in init_user_group_data(), we only fetch
each group's root_id along with
active direct members.
The query in question runs in a loop when you have
multiple group mentions in a message. We can at
least make it slim.
This is my way to address #32934. It doesn't undo
the O(N) behavior, but N here is usually 1 or 2.
Previously, we do not allow mentioning system user groups
at all. Now we want to use silent mention syntax for system
groups in the message sent when updating the posting permission
for a stream, so it is important to allowing silent mentioning
system groups at least. And there is no problem in allowing
silent mentions of system groups for all users.
We do not allow mentioning system groups as can_mention_group
for them is set to "Nobody" group.
There is no behavioral changes to deactivated users as we do
not create UserMessage rows or call the notification code path
for deactivated users in a user group mention. But it is better
to not include the deactivated users in fields like
"mention_user_ids", so this commit updates the code to not
include deactivated users in the computed mention data.
Adds "channel" to the `stream_wildcards` frozenset for stream
wildcard notifications on the backend/server.
Updates frontend/web-app to handle "channel" as the other stream
wildcards are handled in the typeahead and composebox modules.
Updates the API version and documentation for the addition of
"channel" as a wildcard mention. But does not change any of the
functionailty of (or deprecate) the "stream" wildcard at this
point.
Part of project to rename "stream" to "channel".
Previously, when a deactivated user was mentioned, he wasn't
rendered as a Pill. This is because the dataset for validating mentions
only included active users, which is fixed by removing that filter.
To allow only silent mentions of them, an extra is_active property
added to FullNameInfo class, which is populated from the query,
which tells if user is deactivated. This is used to convert any
mentions of them to silent mentions in the backend markdown.
Fixes#26857
Previously, cross realm bots were not displayed as mention Pills.
This is because, the data set for validating mentions considers
only the realm id which is None in case of cross realm bots.
Hence, adding an or Q object to it, to also check if
the email is a part of the cross realm bots email, in case the
realm id returns None.
Fixes#26913
This commit adds a boolean field `mentions_topic_wildcard`
to the `MessageRenderingResult` dataclass.
The field is set to true only if message rendering determines
the message has an actual topic wildcard mention in it (and not,
e.g., topic wildcard mention syntax inside a code block).
The rendered content for topic wildcard mention is
'<span class="topic-mention">{wildcard}</span>'.
The 'topic-mention' class is the identifier for the wildcard
mention being a topic wildcard mention.
We don't use 'data-user-id="*"' and "user-mention" class for
topic wildcard mentions and eventually plan to remove them for
stream wildcard mentions too in a separate mini-project.
This commit adds a 'has_topic_wildcards' instance variable
to the 'MentionData' class for the detection of
- possible topic wildcards mentions.
Fixes part of #22829.
Co-authored-by: Prakhar Pratyush <prakhar841301@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: orientor <aditya.verma@students.iiit.ac.in>
This prep commit replaces the 'wildcard' keyword in the codebase
with 'stream_wildcard' at some places for better readability, as
we plan to introduce 'topic_wildcards' as a part of the
'@topic mention' project.
Currently, 'wildcards = ["all", "everyone", "stream"]' which is an
alias to mention everyone in the stream, hence better renamed as
'stream_wildcards'.
Eventually, we will have:
'stream_wildcard' as an alias to mention everyone in the stream.
'topic_wildcard' as an alias to mention everyone in the topic.
'wildcard' refers to 'stream_wildcard' and 'topic_wildcard' as a whole.
Now the following characters are allowed before @-mentions and stream
references (starting with #) for proper rendering - {, [, /.
This commit makes the markdown rendering consistent with autocomplete
(anything that is autocompleted is also rendered properly).
This diff looks slightly noisy, but the main chunk of
code that we moved here has the same logic as before,
and it just gets realm_id from MentionBackend now, instead
of having our markdown processor have to supply it.
We basically want MentionData to be the gatekeeper of
mention data, and then we delegate backend tasks to
MentionBackend.
Soon we will add a cache to MentionBacked, which will
justify this change a bit more.
It's slightly annoying to plumb Optional[MentionBackend]
down the stack, but it's a one-time change.
I tried to make the cache code relatively unobtrusive
for the single-message use case.
We should be able to eliminate redundant stream queries
using similar techniques.
I considered caching at the level of rendering the message
itself, but this involves nearly as much plumbing, and
you have to account for the fact that several users on
your realm may have distinct default languages (French,
Spanish, Russian, etc.), so you would not eliminate as
many query hops. Also, if multiple streams were involved,
users would get slightly different messages based on
their prior subscriptions.
In many of our stream notification messages, we make use of the
same silent user mention syntax, the template for which was always
hardcoded. This commit adds a helper function that all relevant
callers can call to get the right syntax when mentioning users.
Thanks to Tim Abbott for this suggestion!
This commit adds related_name parameter to UserGroup.direct_members
such that we can use direct_groups instead of the default
usergroupmembership_set for getting all the groups of which the
user is direct member.
This commit also sets related_name of UserGroupMembership.user_group
and UserGroupMembership.user_profile to "+" which means that we will
not be having backward relations for these. This change is correct
since we would need to use the recursive queries to get all the
groups of a user and all the members of a group after we add the
subgroups concept in next commit. This leads to us using direct_members
field of UserGroup instead of usergroupmembership_set in mention code,
but this will soon be replaced with the recursive query function to
include subgroup's members as well.
Extracted this commit from #19866.
Authored-by : Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
We do not allow mentioning system user groups for now
because this can lead to circumventing the wildcard
mention restrictions. It will be enabled once we add
a setting to control that.
This is implemented by just ignoring it as one of the
mentioned user group even if the message content
inlcudes the mention syntax for it and the message
is sent normally.
We still keep the for_mention parameter for accessing
user group while sending email and push notifications
as mentioning system user groups will be allowed in
future.
This commit also removes the test for email notifications
for system user groups as we are not allowing mentioning
them.
This commit is only for backend change as we already
exclude the system groups from mention typeaheads and
other UI.
Prior to this, we only supported direct mention to
the user groups. This commit extends that support
to silent mention for the user groups.
A related test case is also added.
Fixes: #11711.
Earlier, USER_GROUP_MENTIONS_RE was:
r"(?<![^\s\'\"\(,:<])@(\*[^\*]+\*)"
For the syntax: *foo*, this was unnecessarily capturing it as
*foo* and the extraction of `foo` was done using another helper
function: `extract_user_group`.
This is now changed as:
r"(?<![^\s\'\"\(,:<])@(\*(?P<match>[^\*]+)\*)"
and extraction of `foo` can be done just by using the named capture
group `match`.
This change also helps to simplify its related code path.
