When viewing a narrow such as a search or `sender:` view, where
consecutive messages in the view may not be consecutive in their
original stream/topic context, we should avoid displaying the messages
with a shared sender/recipient bar header, as that creates the
incorrect perception that they are consecutive.
Back in 2013 (bc8bc8567b), we
implemented this via the collapse_messages flag, but it appears more
recent refactoring (no more recent than
dbffb2a614) made it always true.
The original logic was incorrect, in that it only considered full-text
search views, and not other views with this property.
I originally planned to use the existing logic for
can_mark_message_read designed for this purpose, but I think there
might be product reasons why might want the logic to be independent.
In message header search bar, users didn't use to get any typeahead
suggestions if a normal filter follows search filter.
E.g.: query => foo bar stream:D
In the above case, users didn't use to get any typeahead suggestions.
This was because we had set that the callers of 'parse' function can
assume that the 'search' operator is present in the last in the query.
Because of which `get_search_result` function (in search_suggestion.js)
didn't use to show any typeahead suggestions as it used to assume that
the latest typed query is for search filters.
Fixes part of #19435.
This will be used to check if the narrow being requested by
spectator requires authentication without requesting the server.
Having this check locally, makes this process look snappy to
the user and doesn't result in 404s in the browser log.
This reverts commit 5e97ec9ad9.
This change has been pretty confusing for users, and so we need to do
something more in order to make the UI acceptable to change this
default.
We want to exclude 1:1 PMs from muted users everywhere
except in `pm-with/<muted_user>`.
This method will help us determine whether we are in such
a narrow.
For filter values which don't exist or are invalid in some
way, we return false to show user that there are no messages
in the filter user is trying to render. Our previous behaviour
was to show all the messages and ignore the filter which
isn't good.
I moved four functions, verbatim, to a new module.
They were in message_util before, which led to
filter.js having several accidental indirect
dependencies.
I considered just putting these four functions in
filter.js, but I think it's a nice abstraction boundary
that filter.js delegates actual message parsing, and
the original author apparently had a similar thought
process.
I also wanted to make it so that a casual reader of
filter.js doesn't think we are manipulating DOM. It's
true that we still indirectly require jquery here, but
it's only for parsing, and it seems plausible we would
eventually use a more low-level parser.
I can see us maybe using these functions in something
like MessageListData in the future, so speculatively
splitting them out might future-proof us from some
cyclical dependencies.
I also think it's plausible that we will just modify
our two markdown processors to attach that kind of
metadata to the messages.
Last but not least, I think there might be opportunity
here to simplify the filter tests and remove some of
the zjquery hacks. We would instead just mock the
message_has_* helpers for the filter tests, and then
do more detailed direct testing on the functions
themselves.
Instead of prohibiting ‘return undefined’ (#8669), we require that a
function must return an explicit value always or never. This prevents
you from forgetting to return a value in some cases. It will also be
important for TypeScript, which distinguishes between undefined and
void.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
ES and TypeScript modules are strict by default and don’t need this
directive. ESLint will remind us to add it to new CommonJS files and
remove it from ES and TypeScript modules.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prettier would do this anyway, but it’s separated out for a more
reviewable diff. Generated by ESLint.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Prior to this commit has:link, has:attachment, has:image
filter couldn't be applied locally and deferred filtering to
web server. This commits make sure client filters all messages
it can instead of completely deferring to the server and hence
improve speed.
A tradeoff is also made to turn off local echo for has: narrows
as messages with link sent to has:link narrow were locally echoing
to another narrow and not appearing in the active has:link narrow.
Fixes: #6186.
In commit 4f6377d493 we added
`_stream_params` as a way of storing attributes such as stream name
and stream privacy, this involved adding a few calls within functions
that updated these values (in order to maintain consistency).
This commit replaces `_stream_params` with an always consistent `_sub`
object and removes unnecessary `_stream_params` related code. Once the
`_sub` object is available, calls to `stream_data` may be considered
suspicious as they can often be avoided by just picking the desired
attribute off of the `_sub` object.
In commit 35c8dcb599 we introduced the
`_stream_params` object within filter.js but we didn't correctly
handle cases where `_stream param`s is undefined within `get_title()`,
`generate_url()` and `get_icon()`, which cause the navbar to if eg a
guest user tries to access a stream they weren't subscribed to.
This commit fixes this by:
* Adding the relevant checks
* Adding node tests that include non-existent streams.
* Adds the 'question-circle-o' icon for non-existent stream narrows.
A side note here is that "non-existent streams" fall under
"common narrows" as per our current definitions, which doesn't really
make sense but shouldn't bother us.
Fixes: #15387.
The navbar currently does not live update the stream name or the icon
for stream privacy correctly.
One place where the correct behaviour gets blocked is on the
`_stream_name` and `_is_stream_private` props on the filter object.
We keep these props for convenience, to reduce calls to `subs`,
however, these props become inconsistent with the values from `subs`
when the stream is renamed or stream privacy is changed.
This refactor extracts out `get_stream_params` and `fix_stream_params`
methods as a prep commit towards correcting the problem, but does not
make any behavioural changes.
This is a prep commit for solving #14728.
