Before this fix, the code would restrict the pointer to be above
either the 1/2 mark or 2/3 mark of the page, depending on your
scrolling direction. This fix makes it so that the system leaves
your scroll and pointer alone when between the 1/5 mark and 4/5
mark. This means the user can read more messages on the screen
at a time before getting paginated.
(imported from commit 98f6319bf63181dd331e037ac20a0c15518725ea)
Re-focuses on the compose box after a send, under these conditions:
1) narrowed to stream+subject -or- responding to PM/huddle
2) compose was initiated by clicking on a message or hitting "r"/"enter"
3) cursor has not moved since you've started the composition
Additionally, if you are thus narrowed, we will move your cursor when you've sent
a message to that message, assuming that such a message initially appears visible.
(imported from commit 373c858081694e6fc9994639340a847d66edb566)
This change fixes the barnowl scrolling so that the ratios of
1/5, 1/2, and 2/3 are all relative to the visible viewport.
The core part of the fix is that we need to call
ui.message_viewport_info() to get the correct offsets for
the top/height of the actually visible viewport Because
this function is fairly expensive, I didn't want the
helper functions needlessly re-calling it. I could
have passed the helper functions the structure, but at
that point it was simpler to inline their functionality.
(imported from commit fb10d99313d568e85acfa70703c4651466acbc21)
Treat "mentioned" messages like "starred" messages for narrowing.
Lots of ugly copy/paste here. There might be opportunity for
some cleanup in places.
(imported from commit e7629890d42643c0000e1cc85422b2a0690f2cc4)
Re-focuses on the compose box after a send, but only if
the compose-box was opened by responding to the message
at the cursor (by hitting "r", enter, or clicking on the message)
(imported from commit 8e7560c8ea31397b57b2bc3e2e7d9dd996226a6f)
The reply-to autoscroll was using a flag that was redundant
to suppress_scroll_pointer_update and then updating it prematurely,
which caused the pointer to move when you clicked on a message to
reply to it. Now the pointer goes to the message you replied to.
(imported from commit e2f49fd6bd0da9a3f4b58c0eb08192ef0ee9abf0)
The main point of this fix is to move some more scroll-related code
into viewport.js, but it also fixes a bug where the size of #main_div
was not accurately representing the full height of the message list.
Making the calculation more accurate narrows the window where we
do pointer adjustements on mousewheel moves.
(imported from commit 5d821f459284c4dbd5ff8056001e54caf4355f1d)
We also record the historical edits to the message in this JSON format:
[{"prev_content": "new test message 14", "timestamp": 1369157249},
{"prev_content": "new test message 13", "timestamp": 1369157118}]
but we don't actually do anything with the information as of yet.
(imported from commit 2d5ca449b87b33ad035ab0e076a22e150c8e7267)
Most of the model logic pertaining to unread counts had been in
zephyr.js, along with a couple global variables. Now the code
is encapsulated in unread.js. It was a pretty straightforward
extraction with some minor method name changes. Also, a small
bit of the logic had also been in stream_list.js.
Conflicts:
tools/jslint/check-all.js
(imported from commit f0abdd48f26ab20c5beaef203479eb5a70dacfff)
Currently the interface for editing messages is limited to a
command-line API tool; it's great for testing with e.g.:
./api/examples/edit-message --message=348135 --content="test $(date +%s)" --site=http://localhost:9991 --subject="test"
The next commit will add a user interface for actually doing the editing.
(imported from commit bdd408cec2946f31c2292e44f724f96ed5938791)
This fixes a pretty subtle bug where the window-focus handler
wasn't updating the unread counts in the title, but it was
hard to notice, because as soon as you moved the mouse, the
problem fixed itself.
Apart from fixing the bug, this patch eliminates the expensive
mouseover handler, which is a big win.
The fix to the window-focus involved some unrelated cleanup. I
decoupled update_title_count() from received_messages(), as the
former method will probably live somewhere else soon.
Also, in order to get window-focus to update the title count,
I went pretty deep in the stack and added a call to
update_title_count() inside of update_unread_counts(). This
fixes window-focus as well as restoring that behavior to
code paths that were calling received_messages().
You'll see that call to update_title_count() is now adjacent
to the call to update_dom_with_unread_counts(), which is
fairly sensible, but then are calls to similar methods like
notifications.received_messages() that happen higher up in
the call chain, which seems kind of inconsistent to me. I
also don't like the fact that you have to go through a
mostly model-based function to get to view-based stuff, so
there are some refactorings coming.
(imported from commit 2261450f205f1aa81d30194b371a1c5ac6a7bdec)
The problem is that if you load a browser window in a stream narrow,
add_message_metadata will be called for the messages in the narrowed
view before it is called for the messages going into the main view
(thus inserting them into all_msg_list), resulting in duplicate
copies of messages.
This would be mostly OK except that we call
process_message_for_recent_subjects inside add_message_metadata, and
that function assumes it is only called once on each message
(otherwise it'll double-count the message).
(imported from commit a3e7f85874100cd93a6d07684605da04d9cc80c7)
Created a function message_viewport_info() to return more accurate
effective viewport info and called it from process_visible_unread_messages().
Also killed off a tiny bit of dead code in process_visible_unread_messages().
(imported from commit 985fcf2fb447dbf1026e2de37574c255a9bd6196)
This refactoring basically splits off two functions from update_unread_counts(),
which then becomes a simple three-liner.
The function get_unread_counts() is extracted, and it's purely functional
computation. It paves the way for a more pull-based approach to getting "unread"
counts, where other parts of the program can just call it to get values as
needed without worrying about side effects. It is staying in zephyr.js for
now.
The other function is stream_list.update_dom_with_unread_counts(), which
has a new home in stream_list.js. It handles all the DOM manipulation
aspect of unread counts in the left pane, mostly by delegating to smaller
functions within stream_list. Some of those smaller functions can now
be turned into private methods FWIW, but I'm not sure it's worth the
trouble.
(imported from commit 799f9ebbaed8d530829a4741ef14be04bd8abf5a)
This is a prefactoring to eventually eliminate the home_unread_messages
global variable. More commits to follow.
In order to set up process_loaded_for_unread() not to modify
global variable to get its job done, we want to pull it out of
add_messages(), so that add_messages() doesn't have to pass back
state to the 9 different places in the codebase where it's called.
There are only 2 places where process_loaded_for_unread() get
called after this commit.
In order to facilitate pulling up process_loaded_for_unread(), I
made it so that the contract for add_messages() was to accept
already-hydrated messages. This way I could hydrate the messages
before calling process_loaded_for_unread() without have to
worry about double-caching them in add_messages. This will
slightly improve performance, but it was mostly done for code
clarity.
(imported from commit ad5aaad5b1f22c31647370f4c9dcb5f89d7d99a7)
This was a workaround for a number of other bugs we had, but at this
point just serves to make debugging more difficult.
(imported from commit 6662b7854c265bd8016f6c8ce75a095731211a45)
Previously we never sent desktop notifications when the browser was
focused, even if the message appeared offscreen. After this commit
there are only a few cases when PM or other notifiable message doesn't
trigger a desktop notification:
(1) You sent it yourself
(2) It was onscreen when it arrived while your Humbug window had focus
(imported from commit e381c02c0e6794594d6934f57249a11ba2a88210)
The .height() and .width() functions are actually pretty expensive for
the number of times we call them. The viewport height and width
don't change often, though, so we can just cache them and recalculate
them on window resize.
(imported from commit 129fb8c058144125e2974f6b7967cd9f1a5c9ead)
The .height() and .width() functions are actually pretty expensive
for the number of times we call them. The callers of within_viewport
already know the offset and height of the row, so we just pass them
in so the values don't have to be recalculated.
(imported from commit d1c077bd87463d695f0bbe337b6a8b04ac2d17ce)
We previously kept the lists in the DOM for all streams and updated
them all when new messages arrived. This was very expensive for
large numbers of streams, so we now just build the subject lists on
demand.
(imported from commit 937ad4322ce2014200aeae8645f79875f6af576e)
We memoize add_message_metadata by checking if the message is already
in the all_msg_list. Therefore, we need to add messages to that
message list before we add it to the narrowed_msg_list.
(imported from commit 4346179376ef6f982162c02c6152a0d294bfb2c0)
We were previously doing this on every message. Because
update_recent_subjects is linear in the number of streams in the
sidebar, this became very slow when we enabled the streams sidebar
for the MIT realm.
(imported from commit 95cd71d83bbcc08cc6c5c79ca567b5d6b9b17173)
This fixes a bug where if you were narrowed to a search and received
a new message that belonged in that search, the message would appear
to have an empty subject and content.
(imported from commit fe1dbf584d3659d57c5b70c7eb45cb22bbc9732f)
