This is a follow-up to #19388.
We will in the future allow patch requests to change the visibility
of an existing topic, so `last_updated` is better name for this field.
This commit does not affect the API or events in any way, but only the
database.
This better matches the title of the page and more generally our
conventions around naming /help/ articles. We include a redirect
because this is referenced from Welcome Bot messages, and we
definitely don't want those links to break.
This parallels fe25517295, but for mobile notifications. It also
adds a test, which verifies that such content does not crash either
mobile or email notifications.
fe25517295 adjusted the email_notifications codepath to use
`lxml.html.fragment_fromstring` method when parsing
`rendered_content`, but left the tests using a helper which called
`fromstring`.
Switching the tests to match the code as run reveals a bug -- using
`drop_tree` on all `message_inline_image` classes now _does_ remove
all of a top-level image-URL-only message. Previously, such messages
were "safe" from the block that calls `drop_tree` only by dint of
`drop_tree` being a silent no-op for the root element. When parsed
using `fragment_fromstring`, they are no longer the root, and as such
an empty message results.
Reorder relative_to_full_url to check for only one `message_inline_image`
within the top `<div>`, and only run the `drop_tree` path in the
alternate case. Tests must be adjusted for their output now including
one more layer of `<div>`.
Our convention is to always have authenticate() called with a request
object. We need to be consistent with that in tests too, to avoid test
failures resulting from breaking that assumption.
We modify assert_login_failure to call client.login() in the same way as
the other similar helpers - with a properly initialized HttpRequest
instance.
Now, when we add a custom animated emoji to the realm
we also save a still image of it (1st frame of the gif). So
we can avoid showing an animated emoji every time.
create_confirmation_link has validity time as an optional argument,
because it has reasonable defaults. Thus it's a better API for
do_send_confirmation_email to make this optional as well, allowing
relying on create_confirmation_link's defaults.
This extends the invite api endpoints to handle an extra
argument, expiration duration, which states the number of
days before the invitation link expires.
For prereg users, expiration info is attached to event
object to pass it to invite queue processor in order to
create and send confirmation link.
In case of multiuse invites, confirmation links are
created directly inside do_create_multiuse_invite_link(),
For filtering valid user invites, expiration info stored in
Confirmation object is used, which is accessed by a prereg
user using reverse generic relations.
Fixes#16359.
The API for changing the batching period was added in
5db4fe8652.
This is a follow up to that commit. We also update the timestamps for
existing scheduled email notifications entries so that the effect of
changing the setting is immediate.
Part of #15280
These hostnames only have MX records for Mailgun and Front, and will
not work as a Zulip organization.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
This commit moves check_settings_values to user_settings.py
from validator.py such that we can import the functions at
the top without any issue of cyclic imports.
We do not allow mentioning system user groups for now
because this can lead to circumventing the wildcard
mention restrictions. It will be enabled once we add
a setting to control that.
This is implemented by just ignoring it as one of the
mentioned user group even if the message content
inlcudes the mention syntax for it and the message
is sent normally.
We still keep the for_mention parameter for accessing
user group while sending email and push notifications
as mentioning system user groups will be allowed in
future.
This commit also removes the test for email notifications
for system user groups as we are not allowing mentioning
them.
This commit is only for backend change as we already
exclude the system groups from mention typeaheads and
other UI.
The name of the new realm created as a tombstone after renaming
a realm's subdomain is the constant 'placeholder-realm'.
This would confuse the user when shown the deactivation notice
and asking to join the realm at a new subdomain.
This PR replaces it with the original realm name to avoid confusion.
Fixes: #19677
This commit modifies the copy_user_settings code such that instead
of source user profile, we can have two types of sources - a user
profile and RealmUserDefault table of realm and then set the
settings from RealmUserDefault only is there is no user profile
as a source.
We also rename copy_user_settings to copy_default_settings for
clarity.
This commit adds do_set_realm_user_default_setting which
will be used to change the realm-level defaults of settings
for new users.
We also add a new event type "realm_user_settings_defaults"
for these settings and a "realm_user_settings_default" object
in '/register' response containing all the realm-level default
settings.
Because we create all realms with do_create_user (including in the
test suite), we just need to change that function, add a migration for
existing realms, and ensure the data import code path correctly
creates these objects.
Note that the import code path will create a RealmUserDefault row with
default values if it is not present in the import data, which is
important for importing data from other tools like Slack.
This commit changes the type of enable_marketing_emails parameter of
create_user to Optional[bool].
The value of this parameter will be None in certain cases when user
registers through SSO and 'TERMS_OF_SERVICE=False' when there will
be no registration form and thus no value of enable_marketing_emails.
We set the enable_marketing_emails setting after copying user
settings to override the value selected in registration form.
This change is also necessary because enable_marketing_emails
field is present in RealmUserDefault to avoid copying code
but we do not use this value actually and instead we want
the setting to be set according to the value in registration
form.
We set this setting only for non-bot users since we generally
do not set any settings for bots.
We extract the checks for default_language, notification_sound,
and email_notifications_batching_period_seconds setting values
in json_change_settings to a new function check_settings_values.
This prevented migration 0345
(517c2ed39d / #19696) from applying on
systems that were created after the refactoring that resulted in the
system bot realm potentially having null as its name.
(We've already confirmed that normal realms, created via
`do_create_realm`, shouldn't be able to have this unusual state).
This check was copied from upstream python-markdown's "safe mode"
before they removed that feature. The upstream history is that they
introduced this check in
2db5d1c8e4,
which was not a complete security check, and then added the
immediately following check (with an allowlist of schemes) in
0b4ffbb60e.
Their first, incomplete check provides no security benefit and makes
the code hard to reason about, so we remove it.
The 'update_global_notifications' type event is sent only for
existing settings and will not be sent for new settings, so we
should use notification_settings_legacy dict to check the type
of setting value in check_update_global_notifications instead
of notification_settings_types dict.
We still used notification_setting_types in copy_user_settings
function of create_user.py and in a test in test_event_system.py.
It is not required to do so since we have added all settings in
property_types already and we loop over property_types at both
these places which includes all settings.
This commit adds `demo_organization_scheduled_deletion_date` to
the `realm` section of the `/register` response so that it is
available to clients when enabled.
This is a part of #19523.
Since 84742a0, all settings are sent in the `user_settings` dictionary
which were previously sent inline with other fields in /register
response.
In order to simplify the process of adding new personal settings, we
want to transition to a world where new settings only need to consider
the `property_types` object, and code that needs to reference the
legacy behavior interacts with an object with `legacy` in its name.
This way, contributors working on new settings don't need to think
about the legacy code paths at all.
See https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/378-api-design/topic/user.20settings.20response.20in.20.2Fregister
to understand this better.
