We change do_create_user and create_user to accept
role as a parameter instead of 'is_realm_admin' and 'is_guest'.
These changes are done to minimize data conversions between
role and boolean fields.
This commit changes the person dict in event sent by do_change_user_role
to send role instead of is_admin or is_guest.
This makes things much more straightforward for our upcoming primary
owners feature.
This commit changes do_change_user_role to support adding or removing
the realm owner status of user and sending an event.
We also extend the existing test for do_change_user_role to do a bit
more validation to confirm the audit log records all values of role.
The new realm_owner role is added as option for role field in
UserProfile model and is_realm_owner is added as property for the user
profile.
Aside from some basic tests validating the logic, this has no effect
as users cannot end up with set as realm owners.
If a user receives more than one invite to join a
realm, after that user registers, all the remaining
invitations should be revoked, preventing them to be
listed in active invitations on admin panel.
To do this, we added a new prereg_user status,
STATUS_REVOKED.
We also added a confirmation_link_expired_error page
in case the user tries click on a revoked invitaion.
This page has a link to login page.
Fixes: #12629
Co-authored-by: Arunika <arunikayadav42@gmail.com>
On invitations panel, invites were being removed when
the user clicked on invitation's link. Now we only remove
it when the user completes registration.
Fixes: #12281
This commit merges do_change_is_admin and do_change_is_guest to a
single function do_change_user_role which will be used for changing
role of users.
do_change_is_api_super_user is added as a separate function for
changing is_api_super_user field of UserProfile.
During events such as stream / topic name edit for a topic, we were
running queries to db in loop for each message for reactions,
submessages and realm_id. This commit reduces the queries to be
done only for realm_id, which is yet to be fixed.
This is accomplished by building messages with empty reactions
and submessages and then updating them in the messages using bulk
queries.
The `email` field for identifying the user being modified in these
events was not used by either the webapp or other official Zulip
clients. Instead, it was legacy data from before we switched years
ago to sending user_id fields as the correct way to uniquely identify
a user.
When a user changes its avatar image, the user's avatar in popovers
wasn't being correctly updated, because of browser caching of the
avatar image. We added a version on the request to get the image in
the same format we use elsewhere, so the browser knows when to use the
cached image or to make a new request to the server.
Edited by Tim to preserve/fix sort orders in some tests, and update
zulip_feature_level.
Fixes: #14290
We remove the `owner` field from `page_params/realm_bots`
and bot-related events.
In the recent commit 155f6da8ba
we added `owner_id`, which we now use everywhere we need
bot owners for.
We also bump the `API_FEATURE_LEVEL` to 5 here. We
had already documented this in the prior commit to
add `owner_id`.
Note that we don't have to worry about mobile/ZT clients
here--we only deal with bot data in the webapp.
For the below payloads we want `owner_id` instead
of `owner`, which we should deprecate. (The
`owner` field is actually an email, which is
not a stable key.)
page_params.realm_bots
realm_bot/add
realm_bot/update
IMPORTANT NOTE: Some of the data served in
these payloads is cached with the key
`bot_dicts_in_realm_cache_key`.
For page_params, we get the new field
via `get_owned_bot_dicts`.
For realm_bot/add, we modified
`created_bot_event`.
For realm_bot/update, we modified
`do_change_bot_owner`.
On the JS side, we no longer
look up the bot's owner directly in
`server_events_dispatch` when we get
a realm_bot/update event. Instead, we
delegate that job to `bot_data.js`.
I modified the tests accordingly.
When editing a message where we mention a usergroup, we would remove
the 'mentioned' flag from messages, resulting in the message being
hidden from your mentions in the UI. This was reported by Greg Price in
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/9-issues/topic/missing.20mention.
We add the same code that we use in do_send_messages to calculate the
updated mentions_user_ids. We add some tests alongside other user group
mention tests in test_bugdown.
These changes should be included in bd9b74436c,
as it makes sure that Zulip limited plan realm won't be able to change the
`message_retention_days` setting.
Member of the org can able see list of invitations sent by him/her.
given permission for the member to revoke and resend the invitations
sent by him/her and added tests for test member can revoke and resend
the invitations only sent by him/her.
Fixes#14007.
Prior to this change, there were reports of 500s in
production due to `export.extra_data` being a
Nonetype. This was reproducible using the s3
backend in development when a row was created in
the `RealmAuditLog` table, but the export failed in
the `DeferredWorker`. This left an entry lying
about that was never updated with an `extra_data`
field.
To fix this, we catch any exceptions in the
`DeferredWorker`, and then update `extra_data` to
encode the failure. We also fix the fact that we
never updated the export UI table with pending exports.
These changes also negated the use for the somewhat
hacky `clear_success_banner` logic.
The logic in do_set_realm_property would previously "change" the email
addrssees of every user in the realm, even if they hadn't actually
changed.
We fix this by skipping the logic when it's unnecessary.
bulk_update is used to update the email of user_profile objects in
database when email_address_visibility is changed.
This helps resolve the problem of timeout errors in realms with large
number of users due to large number of database queries run in a
loop.
Since bulk_update doesn't flush caches, we need our own bit of code to
do that.
Fixes a part of #14600.
We add URLs to the `links_for_embed set`, only when
the `url_embed_preview_enabled` flag is turned on.
So, it is sufficient to check if `links_for_embed`
is not empty.
Previously, the message and event APIs represented the user differently
for the same reaction data. To make this more consistent, I added a
user_id field to the reaction dict for both messages and events. I
updated the front end to use the user_id field rather than the user
dict. Lastly, I updated front end and back end tests that used user
info.
I primarily tested this by running my local Zulip build and
adding/removing reactions from messages.
Fixes#12049.
Generated by autopep8, with the setup.cfg configuration from #14532.
I’m not sure why pycodestyle didn’t already flag these.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Refactored code in actions.py and streams.py to move stream related
functions into streams.py and remove the dependency on actions.py.
validate_sender_can_write_to_stream function in actions.py was renamed
to access_stream_for_send_message in streams.py.
Generated by `pyupgrade --py3-plus --keep-percent-format` on all our
Python code except `zthumbor` and `zulip-ec2-configure-interfaces`,
followed by manual indentation fixes.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
This commit reuses the existing infrastructure for moving a topic
within a stream to add support for moving topics from one stream to
another.
Split from the original full-feature commit so that we can merge just
the backend, which is finished, at this time.
This is a large part of #6427.
The feature is incomplete, in that we don't have real-time update of
the frontend to handle the event, documentation, etc., but this commit
is a good mergable checkpoint that we can do further work on top of.
We also still ideally would have a test_events test for the backend,
but I'm willing to leave that for follow-up work.
This appears to have switched to tabbott as the author during commit
squashing sometime ago, but this commit is certainly:
Co-Authored-By: Wbert Adrián Castro Vera <wbertc@gmail.com>
The distinction between ValueError and TypeError
is not useful in these functions:
- extract_stream_indicator
- extract_private_recipients (or its callees)
These are always invoked in views to validate
user input.
When we use REQ to wrap the validators, any
Exception gets turned into a JsonableError, so
the distinction is not important.
And if we don't use REQ to wrap the validators,
the errors aren't caught.
Now we just let these functions directly produce
the desired end result for both codepaths.
Also, we now flag the error strings for translation.
This improves the error handling for invalid values of the
propagate_mode parameter to our message editing endpoints.
Previously, invalid values would just work like change_one rather than
doing nothing.
We don't need `do_create_user` to send a partial
event here for bots. The only caller to `do_create_user`
that actually creates bots (apart from some tests that
just need data setup) is `add_bot_backend`, which
sends the more complete event including bot "extras"
like service info.
The modified event tests show the simplification
here (2 events instead of 3).
Also, the bot tests now use tuple unpacking, which
will force a ValueError if we duplicate events
again.
Using an Exists subquery to avoid scanning the entire Subscription
table seems to speed things up greatly.
Set up with:
./manage.py populate_db --extra_users 2000 --extra-streams 1000
Tested on my computer, the original function was taking ~1.2seconds,
the optimized version only ~0.05-0.06.
Likely fixes#13874; we can re-open if after production testing we
feel more work is warranted.
This extends our email address visibility settings to deny access to
user email addresses even to organization administrators.
At the moment, they can of course change the setting (which leaves an
audit trail), but in the future only organization owners will be able
to change that setting.
While we're at this, we rewrite the settings_data.js test to cover all
the cases in a more consistent way.
Fixes#14111.
We were using `code` to pass around messages.
The `code` field is designed to be a code, not
a human-readable message.
It's possible that we don't actually need two
flavors of messages for these type of validations,
but I didn't want to change that yet.
We **definitely** don't need to put two types of
message in the exception, so I fix that. Instead,
I just have the caller ask what level of detail
it needs.
I added a non-verbose message for the case of
system bots.
I removed the non-translated version of the message
for deactivated accounts, which didn't have test
coverage and is slightly more prone to leaking
email info that we don't want to leak.
In the prep commits leading up to this, we split
out two new helpers:
validate_email_is_valid
get_errors_for_new_emails
Now when we validate invites we use two separate
loops to filter our emails.
Note that the two extracted functions map to two
of the data structures that used to be handled
in a single loop, and now we break them out:
errors = validate_email_is_valid
skipped = get_errors_for_new_emails
The first loop checks that emails are even valid
to begin with.
The second loop finds out whether emails are already
in use.
The second loop takes advantage of this helper:
get_errors_for_new_emails
The second helper can query all potential new emails
with a single round trip to the database.
This reduces our query count.
