This uses the recently introduced active_mobile_push_notification
flag; messages that have had a mobile push notification sent will have
a removal push notification sent as soon as they are marked as read.
Note that this feature is behind a setting,
SEND_REMOVE_PUSH_NOTIFICATIONS, since the notification format is not
supported by the mobile apps yet, and we want to give a grace period
before we start sending notifications that appear as (null) to
clients. But the tracking logic to maintain the set of message IDs
with an active push notification runs unconditionally.
This is designed with at-least-once semantics; so mobile clients need
to handle the possibility that they receive duplicat requests to
remove a push notification.
We reuse the existing missedmessage_mobile_notifications queue
processor for the work, to avoid materially impacting the latency of
marking messages as read.
Fixes#7459, though we'll need to open a follow-up issue for
using these data on iOS.
Due to copyright issues with potentially displaying Apple emojisets on
non-apple devices, as well as iamcal dropping support for the emojione
emojiset (see https://github.com/iamcal/emoji-data/pull/142), we are
dropping (perhaps temporarily) support for allowing users to switch
emojisets in Zulip.
This commit just hides the feature from the user but leaves most of
the infrastructure in place so that in the future if we decide to
re-enable the support we will not need to redo the infrastructure work
(some JS-side code is deleted, mostly because we'll want to re-add the
feature using the do_settings_change infrastructure anyway).
The most likely emoji set to add is the legacy "blobs" Google emoji
set, since it seems popular with some users.
Tweaked by tabbott to remove some additional JS code and update the
changelog.
This flag is used to track which user/message pairs correspond to an
active mobile push notification, that should potentially be cleared
when the user reads the message.
This flag should never appear on a message that is also marked as
read; eventually we may want a cron job to check for that condition.
We include a partial index on UserMessage for this flag.
This renames Realm.show_digest_email field to
digest_emails_enabled, for greater clarity as to what it does
just from seeing the setting name, without having to look it up.
Fixes part of #10042.
This renames Realm.restricted_to_domain field to
emails_restricted_to_domains, for greater clarity as to what it does
just from seeing the setting name, without having to look it up.
Fixes part of #10042.
The is_private flag is intended to be set if recipient type is
'private'(1) or 'huddle'(3), otherwise i.e if it is 'stream'(2), it
should be unset.
This commit adds a database index for the is_private flag (which we'll
need to use it). That index is used to reset the flag if it was
already set. The already set flags were due to a previous removal of
is_me_message flag for which the values were not cleared out.
For now, the is_private flag is always 0 since the really hard part of
this migration is clearing the unspecified previous state; future
commits will fully implement it actually doing something.
History: Migration rewritten significantly by tabbott to ensure it
runs in only 3 minutes on chat.zulip.org. A key detail in making that
work was to ensure that we use the new index for the queries to find
rows to update (which currently requires the `order_by` and `limit`
clauses).
This is a preparatory refactor for adding
UserProfile.can_subscribe_other_users.
Although there existed a test for limiting users from creating
streams at `test_subs.test_user_settings_for_adding_streams`,
it did not test the logic inside can_add_streams, tests have
been added to solve that issue.
This deletes the unused Subscription.notifications field and removes
it from some testing and analytics code (which should not have been
using it in the first place).
Fixes#10042.
This makes a few tweaks from a pass through the file following up
on the recent 1eb67e4bf, which added documentation comments and
docstrings to a number of fields and models. Also reorder a few
more fields, where that makes things clearer.
There are a lot of specific edits, made as I read through and
particularly where I didn't immediately understand things, or
imagined a reader might have questions. A couple of themes:
* Use blank lines everywhere to set off a given comment and the
items it applies to.
* In a few places where we didn't already, specify concretely how
the meaning is represented in the value (answers include: it's a
number of messages; it's a name from such-and-such namespace;
it's a JSON blob.)
This reorganizes the field definitions to be more readable, and adds
descriptive comments for a number of fields whose purpose might be
otherwise unclear.
This commit creates a new field called delivery_email. For now, it is
exactly the same as email upon user profile creation and should stay
that way even when email is changed, and is used only for sending
outgoing email from Zulip.
The purpose of this field is to support an upcoming option where the
existing `email` field in Zulip becomes effectively the user's
"display email" address, as part of making it possible for users
actual email addresses (that can receive email, stored in the
delivery_email field) to not be available to other non-administrator
users in the organization.
Because the `email` field is used in numerous places in display code,
in the API, and in database queries, the shortest path to implementing
this "private email" feature is to keep "email" as-is in those parts
of the codebase, and just set the existing "email" ("display email")
model field to be something generated like
"username@zulip.example.com" for display purposes.
Eventually, we'll want to do further refactoring, either in the form
of having both `display_email` and `delivery_email` as fields, or
renaming "email" to "username".
The main remaining todo for correctly populating
RealmAuditLog.requires_billing_update is supporting the de-seating (and
corresponding re-seating) that happens after being offline for two weeks.
The only changes visible at the AST level, checked using
https://github.com/asottile/astpretty, are
zerver/lib/test_fixtures.py:
'\x1b\\[(1|0)m' ↦ '\\x1b\\[(1|0)m'
'\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\n' ↦ '\\[[X| ]\\] (\\d+_.+)\\n'
which is fine because re treats '\\x1b' and '\\n' the same way as
'\x1b' and '\n'.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
