External bots may call bot_handler.quit() when
they wish to terminate, e.g. due to a misconfiguration.
Currently, embedded bots ignore calls to quit(), even
though they signal a problem. This commit does the first
step in handling quit() calls by logging a warning.
It catches the `UserProfile.DoesNotExist` exception and
hence prevent internal server error.
Also remove option to select empty bot owner.
Fixes: #8334.
When the answer is False, this will allow the mobile app to show a
warning that push notifications will not work and the server admin
should set them up.
Based partly on Kunal's PR #7810. Provides the necessary backend API
for zulip/zulip-mobile#1507.
We keep having to change the same thing in three places here; and also
the duplicates have accumulated unnecessary variation that makes it
hard to see what's actually supposed to be different and not different
in the three cases.
* Put imports in order.
* `import stripe`; that's the style upstream docs recommend, and it avoids
confusion e.g. between our StripeError and the library's StripeError.
* Simplify loading JSON.
* Keep lines largely to 100 columns.
I got distracted, came back later to a successful test run in my
terminal, and thought I remembered finishing the change and just
kicking off a final test run to check.
In fact, there was an `assert False` right in the normal case for
production, and I just hadn't finished a test for that path. (m.-)
Definitely the most grateful I've been for our coverage checks,
which highlighted this for me.
Remove the `assert False`, and also finish writing the test it was
there to help me write. Those lines are covered now.
This is a wrapper over lru_cache function. It adds following features on
top of lru_cache:
* It will not cache result of functions with unhashable arguments.
* It will clear cache whenever zerver.lib.cache.KEY_PREFIX changes.
The fresh imported data shows that the users emails are not included
in the data. However, the data received from the older method of slack
(which is using legacy tokens) contains the email data of the users.
If some bug in Bugdown results in a rendered message content that is
bigger than twice the message size, we now just throw an exception
from Bugdown. This is considerably better than the old behavior,
which might result in an enormous message being placed in the database
(potentially, bigger than the 1MB limit to store in memcached), which
would in turn result in tragic consequences.
This fixes#8322, in that it prevents the super bad outcome seen there
(where basically Zulip became unusable for everyone on the stream
where the message is posted). Now, the failure mode is just the
message failing to send. Still not ideal (and requires further work
on the URL embed feature), but not a minor problem, not a major one.
The count of integrations is automatically computed now, so this will
change every time we add 10 more. Just stop asserting on the number.
Thanks to @hackerkid for spotting the issue.
Users having only account in one realm will not be distracted by realm
name in subject lines of every email. Users who have multiple
accounts in realms can turn this setting on and receive a
corresponding realm name in email's subject.
Tweaked by tabbott to rebase and address a few small issues.
Fixes#5489.
For messages where the entire rendered body is a message_inline_image
object, we actually don't display any text and just display the
image. These messages may have links to images which might or might
not be internal to Zulip but in both cases there is a chance of this
links being broken when accessed by an email server like Gmail that
doesn't possess the recipient user's cookies.
We don't want to have ugly looking broken images displayed in email
notifications. So we patch this by inserting a replacement for the
`message_inline_image` block in which we essentially replace the
content with the textual link.
Edited for clarity by tabbott.
This will let us defer configuring outbound email to the end of the
install procedure, so we can greatly simplify it by consolidating
several scripted steps.
The new flow could be simplified further by giving the user the full
form in the first place, rather than first a form for just their
email address and then a form with the other details. We'll leave
that improvement for a separate change.
This fixes an issue where the user's own avatar was being sent down
the wire as None. We could have fixed it, as in #8265, by adding code
in the webapp and mobile apps to compute medium-size gravatar URLs as
well, but that would be messy, and there's little benefit to that
complexity (saving at most 2 URLs from the payload).
Fixes#8253.
If an exception was thrown inside `send_email` resulting in a retry,
we would include the `failed_tries` data in the event, which turned
out to thrown an exception itself.
This fixes that flow, including deepening the test so that it would
fail if we didn't have the new logic.
We'll replace this primarily with per-realm quotas (plus the simple
per-file limit of settings.MAX_FILE_UPLOAD_SIZE, 25 MiB by default).
We do want per-user quotas too, but they'll need some more management
apparatus around them so an admin has a practical way to set them
differently for different users. And the error handling in this
existing code is rather confused. Just clear this feature out
entirely for now; then we'll build the per-realm version more cleanly,
and then we can later add back per-realm quotas modelled after that.
The migration to actually remove the field is in a subsequent commit.
Based in part on work by Vishnu Ks (hackerkid).
This is a little cleaner in that the try/except blocks for
SMTPException are a lot narrower; and it'll facilitate an upcoming
change to sometimes skip sending mail.
In this commit we also fix a test which would fail as a result of
doing this cleanup since the test wasn't designed to take into
account the space chars which might occur in the beginning of a
html line.
In the email integration, previously, EMAIL_GATEWAY_EXAMPLE wasn't
rendered at all, which was recently fixed. So, now, we should make
sure that it gets rendered!
In order to get test coverage on topic name checks, we
do them in Addressee, so that we don't hit an assertion
first. The assertion in question is in Addressee.topic(),
and it was added partly to appease mypy.
