This default setup will be more realistic, matching the ordinary
conditions for a modern server.
Especially needed as we add bouncer code that will expect to have
RemoteRealm entries for realm_uuid values for which it receives
requests.
These metadata are essentially all publicily available anyway, and
making uploading them unconditional will simplify some things.
The documentation is not quite accurate in that it claims the server
will upload some metadata that is not actually uploaded yet (but will
by soon). This seems harmless.
This may happen if there are multiple servers with the same UUID
submitting data (e.g. if they were cloned after initial creation), or
if there is one server, but `./manage.py clear_analytics_tables` was
used to truncate the analytics tables.
In the case of `clear_analytics_tables`, the data submitted likely has
identical historical values with new remote `id` values; preserving
the originally-submitted contemporaneous data is the best option. For
the case of submissions from multiple servers, there is no completely
sensible outcome, so the best we can do is detect the case and move
on.
Since we have a lock on the RemoteZulipServer, we know that no other
inserts are happening, so counting before and after will return the
true number of rows inserted (which `bulk_create` cannot do in the
face of `ignore_conflicts`[^1]). We compare this to the expected
number of new inserted rows to detect dropped duplicates.
[^1]: See https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30138.
This is a useful helper using the same API as
send_analytics_to_push_bouncer(), but uploading only realms info. This
is useful to upload realms info without the risk of taking a long time
to process the request due to too much of the *Count analytics data.
This makes it possible to send notifications to more than one app ID
from the same server: for example, the main Zulip mobile app and the
new Flutter-based app, which has a separate app ID for use through its
beta period so that it can be installed alongside the existing app.
This is a CountStat for tracking how many mobile notifications the
server requested.
1. On a self-hosted server, that means requesting from the push bouncer.
2. On a server that's its own push bouncer, that's just the number
directly sent.
This number has room for inaccuracy due to incrementing by the number of
user devices on a self-hosted server, as it doesn't account for errors
that may occur in the GCM/APNs low-level sending codepaths on the bouncer.
Also tests that a server that's its own push bouncer correctly
increments its mobile_pushes_sent::day CountStat, by basing it on the
values returned from the send_apple/android_push_notification functions
which tell us the actual number of successfully sent notifications.
Since the return values of send_..._push_notification are now
used in those codepaths, we need to tweak our mocks in some unrelated
tests to set up some return value to avoid errors.
Add the new model for recording basic information about Realms on remote
server, to go with the other analytics data. Also adds necessary changes
to the bouncer endpoint and the send_analytics_to_push_bouncer()
function to submit such Realm information.
We'll need this information in order to properly direct APNs
notifications. Happily, the Zulip server always sends it when
registering an APNs token; and it appears it always has done so
since the commit:
cddee49e7 Add support infrastructure for push notification bouncer service.
back in 2016. So there's no compatibility issue from requiring it.
This missing `REQ` call has meant we just drop this parameter:
even though the remote Zulip server passes it (for all APNs tokens),
we never notice and never store it. Fix that.
We're going to need to use this information, so we shouldn't just
assume a value; the client should tell us the actual value.
Conveniently, the Zulip mobile app does already pass this parameter
and has since forever. So we can just start requiring it, with no
compatibility constraint.
We already always pass this parameter from the mobile client,
so this makes the tests more realistic already. And we'll shortly
be making this parameter required.
The former name is kind of misleading - this function is for the remote
server to send analytics to the push bouncer. Under our usual
terminology, a "remote server" is a self-hosted Zulip server. So data is
sent FROM not TO a remote server.
This reverts b8581e2895. The mobile
client on Android parses this field using:
```kotlin
timeMs = data.require("time").parseLong("time") * 1000
```
This throws an error if value is not `long` (i.e. an integer),
resulting in dropped notifications on Android from servers which had
deployed b8581e2895.
Switch back to sending an integer, but keep the behaviour from
fd6091ad17 where we send the timestamp in the payload of both
Android and Apple push notifications.
The `expected` flag was incredibly confusing, as you
couldn't tell from the calling code what you were
actually expecting to happen.
I avoid the context manager idiom in order to force
the callers to create simple helper functions, and
I de-duplicate some code in some places.
I also force the caller to explicitly soft-deactivate
the user with one simple line of code, so that the
person reading the test doesn't have to research
the side effects of the helper. (And I make it
very easy for new authors to follow the practice
going forward.)
This is also somewhat of a prep commit to avoid
the obfuscated use of refresh_from_db.
'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' verifies the payload
for notifications generated (for stream messages) due to any of the
push notification triggers, including
'NotificationTriggers.STREAM_PUSH'.
Earlier, 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_notifications' tested
the same thing as 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' with
the only difference that it included content that was not truncated.
This commit removes the test
'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_notifications' and updates
the test 'test_get_message_payload_gcm_stream_message' to cover
both the cases, i.e., truncated as well as not truncated content.
This commit removes the 'alert' field from the payload for
Android via GCM/FCM.
The alert strings generated do not get used at all and have
not been used since at least 2019. On Android, we construct
the notification UI ourselves in the client, and we ignore
the alert string.
This commit adds a test to verify the payload
'get_message_payload_apns' returns when the notification trigger is
'NotificationTriggers.FOLLOWED_TOPIC_PUSH'.
This commit updates the 'get_apns_alert_subtitle' function to
return a common subtitle, i.e., "{full_name} mentioned everyone:"
for wildcard mentions.
The triggers for the stream or topic wildcard mentions include:
* NotificationTriggers.TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION_IN_FOLLOWED_TOPIC
* NotificationTriggers.STREAM_WILDCARD_MENTION_IN_FOLLOWED_TOPIC
* NotificationTriggers.TOPIC_WILDCARD_MENTION
* NotificationTriggers.STREAM_WILDCARD_MENTION
This migration applies under the assumption that extra_data_json has
been populated for all existing and coming audit log entries.
- This removes the manual conversions back and forth for extra_data
throughout the codebase including the orjson.loads(), orjson.dumps(),
and str() calls.
- The custom handler used for converting Decimal is removed since
DjangoJSONEncoder handles that for extra_data.
- We remove None-checks for extra_data because it is now no longer
nullable.
- Meanwhile, we want the bouncer to support processing RealmAuditLog entries for
remote servers before and after the JSONField migration on extra_data.
- Since now extra_data should always be a dict for the newer remote
server, which is now migrated, the test cases are updated to create
RealmAuditLog objects by passing a dict for extra_data before
sending over the analytics data. Note that while JSONField allows for
non-dict values, a proper remote server always passes a dict for
extra_data.
- We still test out the legacy extra_data format because not all
remote servers have migrated to use JSONField extra_data.
This verifies that support for extra_data being a string or None has not
been dropped.
Co-authored-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
