Additionally, migrate existing EditMessageTest to use this helper
method, with the side effect of migrating the tested flow from a
/json/messages URL to a /api/v1/messages URL.
This commit changes the topic edit permssions to not depend whether the user
editing the message had sent the message or it was sent by someone else.
We only do backend changes in this commit and frontend changes will be done
in further commits.
Previously, we always allowed topic edits when the user themseleves had
sent the message not considering the edit_topic_policy and the 3-day time
limit. But now we consider all messages as same and editing is allowed only
according to edit_topic_policy setting and the time limit of 3 days in
addition for users who are not admins or moderators.
We change the topic and stream edit permssions to not depend on
allow_message_editing setting in the API and are allowed even
if allow_message_editing is set to False based on other settings
like edit_topic_policy and can_move_message_between_streams.
Fixes a part of #21739.
This uses the linkifier index among the list of linkifiers in the
replacement as the priority to order the replacement order for
patterns in the topic. This avoids having multiple overlapping matches
that each produce a link.
The linkifier with the lowest id will be prioritized when its pattern
overlaps with another. Linkifiers are prioritized over raw URLs.
Note that the same algorithm is used for local echoing and the
backend markdown processor.
Fixes#23715.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This explicitly enforces ordering on the linkifiers. This is useful when
there are overlapping linkifier patterns that matches the same text. In
our current linkifier implementation, this order affects how the
patterns are handled in the markdown processor, with the earlier ones
being prioritized.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
The same pattern being matched multiple times in a topic cannot be
properly ordered using topic_name.find(match_text) and etc. when there
are multiple matches of the same pattern in the topic.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
remove_user_from_user_group's only caller has been removed in 271333301d.
Its usage has been superseded by remove_members_from_user_group.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Both of these compatibility blocks can be deleted, since you can't
upgrade directly to any supported release from the versions where the
old event formats would be used.
This solves the problem that resolving a topic with a long name (>60
characters) will cause the topic name to be truncated, and thus the edit
message code path thinks that the topic is being moved in addition to
being resolved.
We store the pre-truncation topic and use it to check against the
original topic when determining whether a topic is being moved while
getting (un)resovled or not.
Fixes#23482
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
We intended to send both the "topic was resolved" and the "topic was
moved here" notification when resolving and moving a topic at the same
time in #22312.
The previous implementation did not work as expected and it was only
sending the "topic was moved here" notification.
This removes the check for old_topic and new_topic that have
RESOLVED_TOPIC_PREFIX stripped in maybe_send_resolve_notifications, so
that the notification will be sent regardless if the topic name without
the prefix stays the same or not.
Note that weird topic handling ("✔ ✔✔ some topic") in the comments
was added in e231a03eff is unaffected. In case of confusion, the lstrip
check is not essential to detecting topic being unresolved/resolved.
As we mainly have that handled in the latter part of the helper.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
This allows us to revoke MultiUseInvites by changing their .status
instead of deleting them (which has been deleting the helpful tracking
information on PreregistrationUsers about which MultiUseInvite they came
from).
This doesn't make sense if the realm is active and will fail as soon as
do_reactivate_realm is fixed in the next commit to be a noop and not
create confused RealmAuditLog entries when the realm is active.
There was the following bug here:
1. Send an email invite to a user.
2. Have the user sign up via social auth without going through that
invite, meaning either going via a multiuse invite link or just
straight-up Sign up if the org permissions allow.
That resulted in the PreregistrationUser that got generated in step (1)
having 2 Confirmations tied to it - because maybe_send_to_registration
grabbed the object and created a new confirmation link for it. That is a
corrupted state, Confirmation is supposed to be unique.
One could try to do fancy things with checking whether a
PreregistrationUser already have a Confirmation link, but to avoid races
between ConfirmationEmailWorker and maybe_send_to_registration, this
would require taking locks and so on - which gets needlessly
complicated. It's simpler to not have them compete for the same object.
The point of the PreregistrationUser re-use in
maybe_send_to_registration is that if an admin invites a user, setting
their initial streams and role, it'd be an annoying experience if the
user ends up signing up not via the invite and those initial streams
streams etc. don't get set up. But to handle this, we can just copy the
relevant values from the pre-existing prereg_user, rather than re-using
the object itself.
In 1fce1c3c73, we added logic to parse
the User-Agent in /register requests; this logic crashed if an HTTP request
was missing that header.
Includes a test for `/register` with no user agent passed; this should catch
similar regressions in the future.
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mandera <mateusz.mandera@zulip.com>
For PATCH requests to `/realm/profile_fields`, the field_type is
determined via the field.id, which is in the URL. Therefore,
`field_type` does not need to be passed as part of the request
data in tests.
We do not create historical UserMessage rows, for messages that didn't
have one, while marking messages as read and simply ignore those messages.
We do so because there is no user of creating UserMessage rows and it just
wastes storage.
Note that we still allow to mark messages from unsubscribed streams as
read but only those which have UserMessage rows for them to handle the
case when the unread messages were not marked as read while unsubscribing
from the stream due to some race condition. In such cases, messages
will not be included in the unread count shown in "All messages" menu
(and stream is anyways not present in the left sidebar), but the message
border on the left is green if viewing the stream after unsusbcribing it.
So, to avoid the confusion for users, the messages will be marked as read
when user scrolls down.
We use `templates/zerver/api/api-doc-template.md` as a base template
for the documented API endpoints in `zerver/openapi/zulip.yaml`.
Previously, if this template was called as an endpoint, then it
would fail an assertion check and send server error. Now we check
for specifically for that potential path and return a 404 error
response for no existing article.
Fixes#21876.
In the outgoing webhook handler, there is potentially several seconds
of trying between when a message triggering an outgoing webhook
arrives, and when it fails. In the meantime, the stream the
triggering message was on may have been deleted, causing the
"Failure!" message to have no valid stream to be sent to.
Rather than raise an exception in the outgoing webhook worker, ignore
the exception and move on.
The lambda passed to `queue_json_publish` is used if
`settings.USING_RABBITMQ` is unset -- which is only true in tests. As
such, this pattern causes failures to never actually retry within
tests.
This behaviour has existed ever since the outgoing webhook code was
introduced in 53a8b2ac87, with no explanation. Not passing that
argument allows tests to verify the retry behaviour when webhooks
fail.
Previously, test cases or clients accessing /json/ views using HTTP
Basic Auth would be accepted, while we intended to only allow clients
authenticated with a session cookie to access these views.
This adds a check on the accessed path to avoid this possibility.
It seems unlikely that any API clients clients were taking advantage
of this unintended quirk; so we're not going to bother documenting
this bug fix as an API change. In any case, it should be trivial for
anyone affected to consult the documentation and then switch their
/json/foo URL to a correct /api/v1/foo URL.
Signed-off-by: Zixuan James Li <p359101898@gmail.com>
Mobile clients older than v27.192 do not support PRONOUNS type
custom profile fields, so we instead change the type of it to
SHORT_TEXT in the data sent with register response and also in
the events sent to those clients.
