This commit introduces a banner on the "Start Export" modal
to notify the admin that their personal setting to export
private data is not toggled ON.
The banner is shown when the 'Export type' is 'Standard' and
admin's personal setting to export private data is not toggled ON.
The banner ensures admins are aware their private data will
not be exported unless they enable the respective setting.
This commit is a part of the efforts to rename btn-related classes
and variables to align with Zulip's no-abbreviations policy and
streamline the search results.
Earlier, the count of total users and users who consented in the
'#allow_private_data_export_stats' text were not being live updated.
This commit fixes that behavior.
The counts are now live-updated when:
* a new user joins
* a user is removed
* a user is deactivated
* a user is reactivated
* a user toggles their 'allow_private_data_export' personal setting.
Fixes#31201.
This commit adds a "Export permissions" table
in the 'Data exports' setting panel.
The table lists the active human users and their
configuration of 'allow_private_data_export' setting.
Fixes part of #31201.
This commit adds a 'Type' column to the Data exports table
in the org settings.
It specifies whether it's a public data or standard export.
Fixes part of #31201.
Earlier, only public data export was possible via `POST /export/realm`
endpoint. This commit adds support to create full data export with
member consent via that endpoint.
Also, this adds a 'export_type' parameter to the dictionaries
in `realm_export` event type and `GET /export/realm` response.
Fixes part of #31201.
Since the type of request_method(AjaxRequestHandler) has
been extended in the previous commit.Consequently the 'data'
field of 'request_method' has to be typed such that it
satisfies this change.
Because request_method's type can also be 'typeof patch' which
does not accept undefined 'data' field, I haved 'omit'-ted
'undefined' from 'data's type in function signature to satisfy
TypeScript.
Now ,in support of the changes I have made to two different function
sign(namely setting_ui.do_settings_change,dialog_widget.submit_api_request)
I am stating some points about data field inside these respective
function signs.
1.settings_ui.do_settings_change: For this 'data' was actually never
undefined. Each function call has a 'data' object passed( with one
or more fields).
2.dialog_widget.submit_api_request: For this case many function calls
actually didn't have 'data' field (ie.'data' was undefined).
BUT,for those cases it was defaulted to '{}'(see function sign).
So effectively 'request_method' didn't recieve an undefined 'data' for
this case too. I have removed the defaulting and passed '{}' in the
function calls for those cases, which effectively does the some job,
but satisfies the type.
For both these cases 'data' field isn't undefined and hence an Omit,for me
makes sense.
