This increases consistency and saves a bit of code, but more
importantly, it makes it much easier to switch between these APIs
while refactoring tests.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
It's 2022 and the WHATWG no longer recognizes the term URI. Everything
is now a URL or a type of URL. Which is great because it's way less
confusing. Details here:
https://url.spec.whatwg.org/
Navigation key presses like `Up` and `PageUp` with an empty recipient
boxes will now close the compose and propagate the keypress to the message
list or recent topics, depending upon the active view.
This extends behavior we've had for a long time with focus in the
compose box itself.
Right now, on clicking `quote and reply` on any message, the quoted
message is always inserted at the top of compose-box irrespective of
the current cursor position. Also, after insertion of the quoted
message, the cursor is shifted at the end of the compose box.
This commit changes this behaviour to insertion of quoted message
at the current cursor position with a newline at the end of quote
and moving the cursor position to that newline after insertion.
A newline is added at the beginning of quoted message only if there
was some content already present in compose box before the previous
cursor position.
Tested on Google Chrome and Firefox browsers on Ubuntu dev environment.
Fixes: #16836
This commit adds a new trigger for compose.start that is
"new private message". It will clear the message recipients
whenever compose.start is called with this trigger.
This solves the bug, when a person is in a PM narrow and
clicks the new private message button, it opens the
composebox with the recipients filled out with whoever
you're narrowed to, rather than opening a new, blank PM.
CZO link for the issue
https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/9-issues/topic/.22New.20private.20message.22.20isn't/near/1222712
While writing a long message in compose-box, the last few messages of
the current stream gets covered by the compose-box and it gets pretty
annoying sometimes trying to figure out a way to read the last message
of the stream while writing. Right now, the only way to get past this
is to resize `compose-textarea` by using the resize tool at the
bottom-right corner of the `compose-textarea`. But, that small resize
tool is not always readily visible to the user.
The proposed solution in this commit is to reset the `max-height`
property of `#compose-textarea` everytime `bottom_whitespace_height`
is resized such that the total height of `#compose` is always less
than or equal to the height of `bottom_whitespace_height`. Doing
this, the compose-box never covers the last message of the current
stream.
The only problem with this is that if the compose-box is closed at the
time of bottom-whitespace resize, we cannot find the
`compose_non_textarea_height` and so, we cannot reset the max-height
of `#compose-textarea`. To solve this, max-height of
`compose-textarea` is also reset everytime a new compose-box is opened
according to the value of `bottom_whitespace_height` at that time.
Thus, if the compose-box is already open at the time of
bottom-whitespace resize, the max-height of `#compose-textarea` will
also get reset at the same time, whereas, if the compose-box is closed
at the time of bottom-whitespace resize, the max-height of
`#compose-textarea` won't get reset at that time, but it will surely
get reset whenever the user will open the compose-box.
Tested on my Ubuntu Development Environment on Chrome and Firefox browsers.
Fixes: #16038.
We split recent_topics module into recent_topics_(ui + data + util).
This allows us to reduce cyclical dependencies which were
created due to large list of imports in recent topics. Also, this
refactor on its own makes sense.
We use css() pretty rarely in our codebase, and
it can sometimes be used mistakenly, when a better
alternative is to toggle a class for external css.
It's hard to support the full API in zjquery, so
we just punt and tell folks to create their own
stubs.
Most of the existing tests that were "fixed" here
weren't actually verifying the behavior of the css()
calls, and for those I just create no-op stubs.
In a few places I verify that css() was called as
expected.
We move compose from being a part of message feed to
being a part of middle column which is a common parent of recent
topics and message feed. This allows us to use a common compose
box for both the views. Fortunately, compose actions were
independent of this change so there weren't any evident
side effects.
Fixes#17543
A few years ago I introduced the anti-pattern
of automatically calling success functions within
channel.get stubs. It's better to just capture
the success function and call it explicitly.
Also, we now have override(), so it's easy to
inline these types of things in a safe way.
Use fully resolvable request paths because we need to be able to refer
to third party modules, and to increase uniformity and explicitness.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
For most functions that we were using __Rewire__ for,
it's better to just use the override helper, which
use __Rewire__ under the hood, but also resets
the reference at the end of run_tests.
Another nice thing about override() is that it reports
when you never actually needed the mock, and this
commit fixes the instances found here.
I didn't replace every call to __Rewire__. The
remaining ones fall under these categories:
* I looked for ") =>" in my code sweep,
so I missed stuff like "noop" helpers.
* Sometimes we directly update something
in a module that's not a function. This
is generally evil, and we should use setters.
* Some tests have setup() helpers or similar
that complicated this code sweep, so I
simply punted.
* Somes modules rely on intra-test leaks. We
should fix those, but I just punted for the
main code sweep.
This is a deceptively ugly diff. It makes
the actual code way more tidy.
I basically inlined some calls to mock_module
and put some statements in lexical order.
We now just use a module._load hook to inject
stubs into our code.
For conversion purposes I temporarily maintain
the API of rewiremock, apart from the enable/disable
pieces, but I will make a better wrapper in an
upcoming commit.
We can detect when rewiremock is called after
zrequire now, and I fix all the violations in
this commit, mostly by using override.
We can also detect when a mock is needlessly
created, and I fix all the violations in this
commit.
The one minor nuisance that this commit introduces
is that you can only stub out modules in the Zulip
source tree, which is now static/js. This should
not really be a problem--there are usually better
techniques to deal with third party depenencies.
In the prior commit I show a typical workaround,
which is to create a one-line wrapper in your
test code. It's often the case that you can simply
use override(), as well.
In passing I kill off `reset_modules`, and I
eliminated the second argument to zrequire,
which dates back to pre-es6 days.
