We use this function to show who's typing in the
direct messages narrow.
Renamed it because, with the addition of stream typists to
`typist_dct` in the next commit, this might be confusing.
This commit addresses the discussed issue by renaming
'get_all_typists()' to 'get_all_direct_message_typists'.
Correct the `PUT` to `POST` in the
`/docs/tutorial/life-of-a-request.md` to match it with the actual code
in `zproject/urls.py` route: '/users'. (The HTTP method changed at
some point).
Tested by tabbott using:
curl -v -X HEAD https://chat.zulip.org/api/v1/users
This fixes the explanation of the setting's syntax to be more precise
(which doesn't mean "easily understandable" - because the setting is
a bit tricky) as well as an example to illustrate it.
The deleted CSS around the `.zulip-icon-ellipsis-v-solid` class
has no impact on the hover controls, as flexbox and grid are
handling baseline alignment, not this one-off line-height.
While an en dash--as replaced here with a hyphen--is sounder
typographically, the other ranges in the file use a hyphen, which
is arguably also more interoperable in a plain-text file such as
this (though other en dashes live on in the file, as part of the
original licensing text).
This makes all shortened forms of "incorporated" uniform across
the file, and matches how "Twitter, Inc." is presented in the files
in question, e.g., atop `web/third/bootstrap/js/bootstrap.js`.
Updates the main description of the `api/set-typing-status` endpoint
for the new fields in the register response for the typing start,
stop, expired time intervals. Previously these were hardcoded by
the client side code and not the server side code.
Also updates the developer documentation for typing indicators in
the subsystems docs. This refreshes a few parts of that doc that
were already out of date, as well as adds the information about
the new register response fields noted above.
Previously I've wanted to have this page spell out the concrete
version number that our clients support, rather than the policy we
use for determining that version number, because that's the sort of
question that I feel like as a user I'd want a straight answer to
and would be annoyed if I couldn't get one.
But as the text stands, it's come to look more like it's the policy
(something that's heavyweight to change) than like the value that
the policy currently happens to work out to. Also, because this page
is kind of chaotically organized (and fixing that is a bigger yak
than I want to shave right now), it repeats the 18-month rule in
three separate places and the current value (version 4.0) is in
a fourth separate place, so it looks internally inconsistent.
Let's therefore take a different tack: like in those other three
spots on this page, state just the policy instead of the value it
currently works out to; but also add a link to help the reader
pin down for themselves what value that does work out to.
This also means we no longer need to update this page as old releases
age and that value advances.
Also fix a typo, and cut the reference to working degraded on
older releases. Starting earlier this year we finally started
hard-refusing such connections:
https://github.com/zulip/zulip-mobile/issues/5102https://github.com/zulip/zulip-mobile/pull/5633
(which was because there were some swathes of compatibility code
that we could only cut if we completely broke the handling of
ancient servers, and so we preferred to have the app communicate
that break clearly up front.)
Tweaked provision script to run successfully in Fedora 38 and
included a script to build the groonga libs from source because
the packages in Fedora repos are outdated.
There is a major version jump from the last supported version (F34)
which is EOL so references and support for older versions were
removed.
Fixes: #20635
Almost all users of JsonSuccessBase seem to also include
SuccessDescription. /server_settings used a different description from
the rest of the JsonSuccessBase users, but the difference is small
enough that using the generic description of the former
SuccessDescription is fine.
The "followup_day2" email template name is not clear or descriptive
about the purpose of the email. Creates a duplicate of those email
template files with the template name "zulip_onboarding_topics".
Because any existing scheduled emails that use the "followup_day2"
templates will need to be updated before the current templates can
be removed, we don't do a simple file rename here.
