No change to behavior. non_mit_mailing_list never returned False, so it was
never possible to reach the line "Otherwise, the user is an MIT mailing
list, and .."
send_event() expects a list of user ids (ints) except for the special case
of messages. This commit:
1. Fixes this in the call to send_event() in do_send_typing_notification()
2. Renames the variables in do_send_typing_notification() to better reflect
their content (for example, recipient_ids instead of recipients).
3. Renames the id field in the dicts sent in the typing event body (sender,
recipients) to user_id.
4. Adds assertions to the tests to verify that the tornado event user ids
are the same as the recipients in the event body.
5. Adds assertions to the tests to verify that the tornado event user
ids and the recipient user ids (in the event body) are the same as the
expected user ids (obtained from the emails using
get_user_profile_by_email)
6. Changes all assertTrues to assertEquals in the tests
This fixes#2151.
This makes it possible to configure only certain authentication
methods to be enabled on a per-realm basis.
Note that the authentication_methods_dict function (which checks what
backends are supported on the realm) requires an in function import
due to a circular dependency.
We recently made it so that a cross-realm bot can only send
messages to one realm at a time. (It can send to a realm
outside of its offical realm, but only one of them.) This
test adds coverage for that.
Disallow Realm.string_id's like "streams", "about", and several hundred
others. Also restrict string_id's to be at least 3 characters long, and only
use characters in [a-z0-9-].
Does not restrict realms created by the create_realm.py management command.
Before it was in UserSignUpTest, now it is in RealmCreationTest. The diff
makes it look like test_user_default_language is the target of the move,
but it isn't.
If a stream is public, we now send notifications to all realm users
if the name or description of the stream changes. For private
streams, the behavior remains the same.
We do this by introducing a method called
can_access_stream_user_ids().
(showell helped with this fix)
Fixes#2195
Previously, we set restrict_to_domain and invite_required differently
depending on whether we were setting up a community or a corporate
realm. Setting restrict_to_domain requires validation on the domain of the
user's email, which is messy in the web realm creation flow, since we
validate the user's email before knowing whether the user intends to set up
a corporate or community realm. The simplest solution is to have the realm
creation flow impose as few restrictions as possible (community defaults),
and then worry about restrict_to_domain etc. after the user is already in.
We set the test suite to explictly use the old defaults, since several of
the tests depend on the old defaults.
This commit adds a database migration.
This test seems intended to verify registration in the case of a
unique completely open domain; but because of the mit.edu realm, it
instead tested that a logic bug in the non-subdomains case was
present.
We now send dictionaries for cross-realm bots. This led to the
following changes:
* Create get_cross_realm_dicts() in actions.py.
* Rename the page_params field to cross_realm_bots.
* Fix some back end tests.
* Add cross_realm_dict to people.js.
* Call people.add for cross-realm bots (if they are not already part of the realm).
* Remove hack to add in feedback@zulip.com on the client side.
* Add people.is_cross_realm_email() and use it in compose.js.
* Remove util.string_in_list_case_insensitive().
Adds a database migration, adds a new string_id argument to the management
realm creation command, and adds a short name field to the web realm
creation form when REALMS_HAVE_SUBDOMAINS is False.
Does a database migration to rename Realm.subdomain to
Realm.string_id, and makes Realm.subdomain a property. Eventually,
Realm.string_id will replace Realm.domain as the handle by which we
retrieve Realm objects.
We now simply exclude all cross-realm bots from the set of emails
under consideration, and then if the remaining emails are all in
the same realm, we're good.
This fix changes two behaviors:
* You can no longer send a PM to an ordinary user in another realm
by piggy-backing a cross-realm bot on to the message. (This was
basically a bug, but it would never manifest under current
configurations.)
* You will be able to send PMs to multiple cross-realm bots at once.
(This was an arbitrary restriction. We don't really care about this
scenario much yet, and it fell out of the new implementation.)
We can currently send a PM to a user in another realm, as long
as we copy a cross-realm bot from the same realm. This loophole
doesn't yet affect us in practice--all cross-realm bots are
generally configured for the "admin" realm like the old zulip.com--
but we should lock it down in a subsequent commit.
