zerver/lib/actions: removed do_set_realm_* functions and added
do_set_realm_property, which takes in a realm object and the name and
value of an attribute to update on that realm.
zerver/tests/test_events.py: refactored realm tests with
do_set_realm_property.
Kept the do_set_realm_authentication_methods and
do_set_realm_message_editing functions because their function
signatures are different.
Addresses part of issue #3854.
This makes get_stream match get_realm, get_user_profile_by_email,
etc., in interface, and is more convenient for mypy annotations
because `get_stream` now doesn't return an Optional[Stream].
We use the same strategy Zulip already uses for starred messages,
namely, creating a new UserMessage row with the "historical" flag set
(which basically means Zulip can ignore this row for most purposes
that use UserMessage rows). The historical flag is ignored, however,
in determining which users' browsers to notify about new reactions,
and thus the user will get to see the reaction appear when they click
a message (and any reactions other users later add, as well!).
There's still something of a race here, in that if some users react to
a message while the user is looking at the unsubscribed stream but
before the user reacts to that message, those reactions will not be
displayed to that user (so counts will be a bit lower, or something).
This race feels small enough to ignore for now.
Fixes#3345.
In aa880b0419, we used the raw
do_set_realm_description method rather than calling the API, which
meant that the API success path wasn't actually tested.
This adds an organization description field to the Realm model, as well as
an input field to the organization settings template. Added three tests.
Set the max length of the field to 100 characters.
Fixes#3962.
Changing assert_in_success_response to require List[Text] instead of
Iterable[Text] prevents the following misuse:
self.assert_in_response_success("message", response)
Currently, this will check whether 'm', 'e', 's', 'a', and 'g' separately
appear in the response, which is probably not the intended behavior. The
correct usage is as follows:
self.assert_in_response_success(["message"], response)
This of course only works in the 2 minute window where missed-message
emails are planned, but nonetheless likely avoids common cases of
emailing users with deleted messages.
Fixes: #3873.
Missed-message email replies using the reply-to of
noreply@zulipchat.com shouldn't advertise that "just replying" will
work.
Rebased and commit message rewritten by tabbott.
Fixes#3965.
On reloading the page after disabling email changes does not check
the "Prevent users from changing their email address".
Adding realm_email_changes_disabled to page_params_core_fields fixes the problem.
