Since we've changed the database to contain these new fields, we just
need to stop dropping them in the API code.
This also changes the public API to match the database format again
by removing `prev_subject` from edit history API.
Adds an API changelog feature update for the renamed `prev_subject`
field (to `prev_topic`) and new fields (`topic` and `stream`)
in the message `edit_history`.
Also, documents said `edit_history` in the `MessagesBase` schema
in the api documentation, which is used by the `/get-messages`,
`/get-events` and `/zulip-outgoing-webhooks` endpoints.
Fixes#21076.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn.menard@gmail.com>
We modify the message_edit_history marshalling code so that this
commit does not change the API, since we haven't backfilled the data
yet.
FormattedEditHistoryEvent, introduced in the previous commit, doesn't
directly inherit fields from EditHistoryEvent, so no changes are
required there.
We fix the mutation of caller and other bad patterns, as well as
adding explicit typing to make the code readable.
We also update the OpenAPI documentation for previously
undocumented `prev_strem` field in the `/get-message-history`
endpoint for API validation testing.
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn.menard@gmail.com>
These types will help make iteration on this code easier.
Note that `user_id` can be null due to the fact that
edit history entries before March 2017 did not log
the user that made the edit, which was years after
supporting topic edits (discovered in test deployment
of migration on chat.zulip.org).
Co-authored-by: Lauryn Menard <lauryn.menard@gmail.com>
The database value for expiry_date is None for the invite
that will never expire and the clients send -1 as value
in the API similar to the message retention setting.
Also, when passing invite_expire_in_days as an argument
in various functions, invite_expire_in_days is passed as
-1 for "Never expires" option since invite_expire_in_days
is an optional argument in some functions and thus we cannot
pass "None" value.
None of the existing custom profile field types have the value as an
integer like declared in many places - nor is it a string like currently
decalred in types.py. The correct type is Union[str, List[int]]. Rather
than tracking this in so many places throughout the codebase, we add a
new ProfileDataElementValue type and insert it where appropriate.
Fixes#17277.
The main limitation of this implementation is that the sync happens if
the user authing already exists. This means that a new user going
through the sign up flow will not have their custom fields synced upon
finishing it. The fields will get synced on their consecutive log in via
SAML in the future. This can be addressed in the future by moving the
syncing code further down the codepaths to login_or_register_remote_user
and plumbing the data through to the user creation process.
We detail that limitation in the documentation.
The old type in default_settings wasn't right - limit_to_subdomains is a
List[str]. We define a TypeDict for capturing the typing of the settings
dict more correctly and to allow future addition of configurable
attributes of other non-str types.
Old: a validator returns None on success and returns an error string
on error.
New: a validator returns the validated value on success and raises
ValidationError on error.
This allows mypy to catch mismatches between the annotated type of a
REQ parameter and the type that the validator actually validates.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
The Python 3.6 style does support non-total and even partially-total
TypedDict, but total gives us better guarantees.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Fixes#2665.
Regenerated by tabbott with `lint --fix` after a rebase and change in
parameters.
Note from tabbott: In a few cases, this converts technical debt in the
form of unsorted imports into different technical debt in the form of
our largest files having very long, ugly import sequences at the
start. I expect this change will increase pressure for us to split
those files, which isn't a bad thing.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
Instead of having the rather unclear type Union[str,
List[UserDisplayRecipient]] where display_recipient of message dicts was
involved, we use DisplayRecipientT (renamed from DisplayRecipientCacheT
- since there wasn't much reason to have the word Cache in there), which
makes it clearer what is the actual nature of the objects and gets rid
of this pretty big type declaration.
Since the display_recipients dictionaries corresponding to users are
always dictionaries with keys email, full_name, short_name, id,
is_mirror_dummy - instead of using the overly general Dict[str, Any]
type, we can define a UserDisplayRecipient type,
using an appropriate TypedDict.
The type definitions are moved from display_recipient.py to types.py, so
that they can be imported in models.py.
Appropriate type adjustments are made in various places in the code
where we operate on display_recipients.
It was allowing us to get away with wrong types on a few functions:
`check_send_typing_notification` and `send_notification_backend` can be
(and are) called with a list of `int` as `notification_to`, not just a
list of `str`.
The problem it was working around already had a better solution using
the dummy `type` argument. Use that.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulipchat.com>
Add new custom profile field type, External account.
External account field links user's social media
profile with account. e.g. GitHub, Twitter, etc.
Fixes part of #12302
This commit modifies FIELD_TYPE_DATA dict in `CustomProfileField`
model to store keyword of field types. And create new dict
FIELD_TYPE_CHOICES_DICT to store all field type information
by field type keyword, i.e. id, name.
This is preparatory commit to remove all static use of field
types in frontend and access field type with keyword instead
of display name.
Originally was going to centralize this in zerver/lib/request.pyi, but this
file is not visible at run-time, being only a stub. The matching request.py
file seemed inappropriate, as it doesn't actually use ViewFuncT.
