mirror of
https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
synced 2025-10-23 16:14:02 +00:00
df001db1a9
Black 23 enforces some slightly more specific rules about empty line counts and redundant parenthesis removal, but the result is still compatible with Black 22. (This does not actually upgrade our Python environment to Black 23 yet.) Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
45 lines
1.6 KiB
Python
45 lines
1.6 KiB
Python
# Generated by Django 1.11.23 on 2019-08-28 19:48
|
|
|
|
from django.db import migrations, models
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
|
dependencies = [
|
|
("zerver", "0245_message_date_sent_finalize_part1"),
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
operations = [
|
|
# Until now, date_sent was in ArchivedMessage only for the sake of keeping the model
|
|
# compatible with Message.
|
|
# We can now remove it, and rename pub_date to date_sent to have this column
|
|
# set correctly for all existing rows.
|
|
migrations.RemoveField(
|
|
model_name="archivedmessage",
|
|
name="date_sent",
|
|
),
|
|
migrations.RenameField(
|
|
model_name="archivedmessage",
|
|
old_name="pub_date",
|
|
new_name="date_sent",
|
|
),
|
|
# All the below AlterField does is change verbose_name, which doesn't even generate any SQL,
|
|
# it's just a purely-Django attribute.
|
|
migrations.AlterField(
|
|
model_name="archivedmessage",
|
|
name="date_sent",
|
|
field=models.DateTimeField(db_index=True, verbose_name="date sent"),
|
|
),
|
|
# Django doesn't rename the index when renaming a column, which can be confusing
|
|
# for someone inspecting the table in the future who's not aware of the old name.
|
|
# We should rename appropriately here.
|
|
migrations.RunSQL(
|
|
"""
|
|
ALTER INDEX IF EXISTS zerver_archivedmessage_pub_date_509062c8 RENAME TO zerver_archivedmessage_date_sent_509062c8
|
|
"""
|
|
),
|
|
migrations.RemoveField(
|
|
model_name="message",
|
|
name="pub_date",
|
|
),
|
|
]
|