mirror of
				https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
				synced 2025-11-03 21:43:21 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Removed `is_billing_admin` user property as it is no longer used since billing permissions are now determined by `can_manage_billing_group` realm setting.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			572 lines
		
	
	
		
			24 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Python
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			572 lines
		
	
	
		
			24 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Python
		
	
	
	
	
	
from datetime import timedelta
 | 
						|
from unittest import mock
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
import orjson
 | 
						|
import time_machine
 | 
						|
from django.utils.timezone import now as timezone_now
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
from zerver.actions.realm_settings import do_change_realm_permission_group_setting
 | 
						|
from zerver.actions.users import do_change_can_create_users, do_change_user_role
 | 
						|
from zerver.lib.exceptions import JsonableError, StreamWildcardMentionNotAllowedError
 | 
						|
from zerver.lib.streams import access_stream_for_send_message
 | 
						|
from zerver.lib.test_classes import ZulipTestCase
 | 
						|
from zerver.lib.test_helpers import most_recent_message
 | 
						|
from zerver.lib.users import is_administrator_role
 | 
						|
from zerver.models import Realm, UserProfile, UserStatus
 | 
						|
from zerver.models.groups import NamedUserGroup, SystemGroups
 | 
						|
from zerver.models.realms import get_realm
 | 
						|
from zerver.models.streams import get_stream
 | 
						|
from zerver.models.users import get_user_by_delivery_email
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
# Most Zulip tests use ZulipTestCase, which inherits from django.test.TestCase.
 | 
						|
# We recommend learning Django basics first, so search the web for "django testing".
 | 
						|
# A common first result is https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.0/topics/testing/
 | 
						|
class TestBasics(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    def test_basics(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # Django's tests are based on Python's unittest module, so you
 | 
						|
        # will see us use things like assertEqual, assertTrue, and assertRaisesRegex
 | 
						|
        # quite often.
 | 
						|
        # See https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertEqual
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(7 * 6, 42)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestBasicUserStuff(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # Zulip has test fixtures with built-in users.  It's good to know
 | 
						|
    # which users are special. For example, Iago is our built-in
 | 
						|
    # realm administrator.  You can also modify users as needed.
 | 
						|
    def test_users(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # The example_user() helper returns a UserProfile object.
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(hamlet.full_name, "King Hamlet")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(hamlet.role, UserProfile.ROLE_MEMBER)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(iago.role, UserProfile.ROLE_REALM_ADMINISTRATOR)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        polonius = self.example_user("polonius")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(polonius.role, UserProfile.ROLE_GUEST)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(self.example_email("cordelia"), "cordelia@zulip.com")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_lib_functions(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # This test is an example of testing a single library function.
 | 
						|
        # Our tests aren't always at this level of granularity, but it's
 | 
						|
        # often possible to write concise tests for library functions.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Get our UserProfile objects first.
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # It is a good idea for your tests to clearly demonstrate a
 | 
						|
        # **change** to a value.  So here we want to make sure that
 | 
						|
        # do_change_user_role will change Hamlet such that
 | 
						|
        # is_administrator_role becomes True, but we first assert it's
 | 
						|
        # False.
 | 
						|
        self.assertFalse(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Tests should modify properties using the standard library
 | 
						|
        # functions, like do_change_user_role. Modifying Django
 | 
						|
        # objects and then using .save() can be buggy, as doing so can
 | 
						|
        # fail to update caches, RealmAuditLog, or related tables properly.
 | 
						|
        do_change_user_role(hamlet, UserProfile.ROLE_REALM_OWNER, acting_user=iago)
 | 
						|
        self.assertTrue(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # After we promote Hamlet, we also demote him.  Testing state
 | 
						|
        # changes like this in a single test can be a good technique,
 | 
						|
        # although we also don't want tests to be too long.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # Important note: You don't need to undo changes done in the
 | 
						|
        # test at the end. Every test is run inside a database
 | 
						|
        # transaction, that is reverted after the test completes.
 | 
						|
        # There are a few exceptions, where tests interact with the
 | 
						|
        # filesystem (E.g. uploading files), which is generally
 | 
						|
        # handled by the setUp/tearDown methods for the test class.
 | 
						|
        do_change_user_role(hamlet, UserProfile.ROLE_MODERATOR, acting_user=iago)
 | 
						|
        self.assertFalse(is_administrator_role(hamlet.role))
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestFullStack(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # Zulip's backend tests are largely full-stack integration tests,
 | 
						|
    # making use of some strategic mocking at times, though we do use
 | 
						|
    # unit tests for some classes of low-level functions.
 | 
						|
    #
 | 
						|
    # See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/philosophy.html
 | 
						|
    # for details on this and other testing design decisions.
 | 
						|
    def test_client_get(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Most full-stack tests require you to log in the user.
 | 
						|
        # The login_user helper basically wraps Django's client.login().
 | 
						|
        self.login_user(hamlet)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Zulip's client_get is a very thin wrapper on Django's client.get.
 | 
						|
        # We always use the Zulip wrappers for client_get and client_post.
 | 
						|
        url = f"/json/users/{cordelia.id}"
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_get(url)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Almost every meaningful full-stack test for a "happy path" situation
 | 
						|
        # uses assert_json_success().
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # When we unpack the result.content object, we prefer the orjson library.
 | 
						|
        content = orjson.loads(result.content)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # In this case we will validate the entire payload. It's good to use
 | 
						|
        # concrete values where possible, but some things, like "cordelia.id",
 | 
						|
        # are somewhat unpredictable, so we don't hard code values.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # Others, like email and full_name here, are fields we haven't
 | 
						|
        # changed, and thus explicit values would just be hardcoding
 | 
						|
        # test database defaults in additional places.
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(
 | 
						|
            content["user"],
 | 
						|
            dict(
 | 
						|
                avatar_url=content["user"]["avatar_url"],
 | 
						|
                avatar_version=1,
 | 
						|
                date_joined=content["user"]["date_joined"],
 | 
						|
                delivery_email=None,
 | 
						|
                email=cordelia.email,
 | 
						|
                full_name=cordelia.full_name,
 | 
						|
                is_active=True,
 | 
						|
                is_admin=False,
 | 
						|
                is_bot=False,
 | 
						|
                is_guest=False,
 | 
						|
                is_owner=False,
 | 
						|
                role=UserProfile.ROLE_MEMBER,
 | 
						|
                timezone="Etc/UTC",
 | 
						|
                user_id=cordelia.id,
 | 
						|
            ),
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_client_post(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # Here we're gonna test a POST call to /json/users, and it's
 | 
						|
        # important that we not only check the payload, but we make
 | 
						|
        # sure that the intended side effects actually happen.
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        self.login_user(iago)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        realm = get_realm("zulip")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(realm.id, iago.realm_id)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Get our failing test first.
 | 
						|
        self.assertRaises(
 | 
						|
            UserProfile.DoesNotExist, lambda: get_user_by_delivery_email("romeo@zulip.net", realm)
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Before we can successfully post, we need to ensure
 | 
						|
        # that Iago can create users.
 | 
						|
        do_change_can_create_users(iago, True)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        params = dict(
 | 
						|
            email="romeo@zulip.net",
 | 
						|
            password="xxxx",
 | 
						|
            full_name="Romeo Montague",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Use the Zulip wrapper.
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_post("/json/users", params)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Once again we check that the HTTP request was successful.
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
        content = orjson.loads(result.content)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Finally we test the side effect of the post.
 | 
						|
        user_id = content["user_id"]
 | 
						|
        romeo = get_user_by_delivery_email("romeo@zulip.net", realm)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(romeo.id, user_id)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_can_create_users(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # Typically, when testing an API endpoint, we prefer a single
 | 
						|
        # test covering both the happy path and common error paths.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/philosophy.html#share-test-setup-code.
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        self.login_user(iago)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        do_change_can_create_users(iago, False)
 | 
						|
        valid_params = dict(
 | 
						|
            email="romeo@zulip.net",
 | 
						|
            password="xxxx",
 | 
						|
            full_name="Romeo Montague",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # We often use assert_json_error for negative tests.
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_error(result, "User not authorized to create users", 400)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        do_change_can_create_users(iago, True)
 | 
						|
        incomplete_params = dict(
 | 
						|
            full_name="Romeo Montague",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_post("/json/users", incomplete_params)
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_error(result, "Missing 'email' argument", 400)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Verify that the original parameters were valid. Especially
 | 
						|
        # for errors with generic error messages, this is important to
 | 
						|
        # confirm that the original request with these parameters
 | 
						|
        # failed because of incorrect permissions, and not because
 | 
						|
        # valid_params weren't actually valid.
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Verify error handling when the user already exists.
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_post("/json/users", valid_params)
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_error(result, "Email is already in use.", 400)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_tornado_redirects(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # Let's poke a bit at Zulip's event system.
 | 
						|
        # See https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/subsystems/events-system.html
 | 
						|
        # for context on the system itself and how it should be tested.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # Most specific features that might feel tricky to test have
 | 
						|
        # similarly handy helpers, so find similar tests with `git grep` and read them!
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
        self.login_user(cordelia)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        params = dict(status_text="on vacation")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Use the capture_send_event_calls context manager to capture events.
 | 
						|
        with self.capture_send_event_calls(expected_num_events=1) as events:
 | 
						|
            result = self.api_post(cordelia, "/api/v1/users/me/status", params)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Check that the POST to Zulip caused the expected events to be sent
 | 
						|
        # to Tornado.
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(
 | 
						|
            events[0]["event"],
 | 
						|
            dict(type="user_status", user_id=cordelia.id, status_text="on vacation"),
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Grabbing the last row in the table is OK here, but often it's
 | 
						|
        # better to look up the object we created via its ID,
 | 
						|
        # especially if there's risk of similar objects existing
 | 
						|
        # (E.g. a message sent to that topic earlier in the test).
 | 
						|
        row = UserStatus.objects.last()
 | 
						|
        assert row is not None
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(row.user_profile_id, cordelia.id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(row.status_text, "on vacation")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestStreamHelpers(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # Streams are an important concept in Zulip, and ZulipTestCase
 | 
						|
    # has helpers such as subscribe, users_subscribed_to_stream,
 | 
						|
    # and make_stream.
 | 
						|
    def test_new_streams(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
        othello = self.example_user("othello")
 | 
						|
        realm = cordelia.realm
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        stream_name = "Some new stream"
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(cordelia, stream_name)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia})
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(othello, stream_name)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(
 | 
						|
            set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia, othello}
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_private_stream(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # When we test stream permissions, it's very common to use at least
 | 
						|
        # two users, so that you can see how different users are impacted.
 | 
						|
        # We commonly use Othello to represent the "other" user from the primary user.
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
        othello = self.example_user("othello")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        realm = cordelia.realm
 | 
						|
        stream_name = "Some private stream"
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Use the invite_only flag in make_stream to make a stream "private".
 | 
						|
        stream = self.make_stream(stream_name=stream_name, invite_only=True)
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(cordelia, stream_name)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(set(self.users_subscribed_to_stream(stream_name, realm)), {cordelia})
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        stream = get_stream(stream_name, realm)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(stream.name, stream_name)
 | 
						|
        self.assertTrue(stream.invite_only)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # We will now observe that Cordelia can access the stream...
 | 
						|
        access_stream_for_send_message(cordelia, stream, forwarder_user_profile=None)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # ...but Othello can't.
 | 
						|
        with self.assertRaisesRegex(JsonableError, "Not authorized to send to channel"):
 | 
						|
            access_stream_for_send_message(othello, stream, forwarder_user_profile=None)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestMessageHelpers(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # If you are testing behavior related to messages, then it's good
 | 
						|
    # to know about send_stream_message, send_personal_message, and
 | 
						|
    # most_recent_message.
 | 
						|
    def test_stream_message(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(hamlet, "Denmark")
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(iago, "Denmark")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # The functions to send a message return the ID of the created
 | 
						|
        # message, so you usually you don't need to look it up.
 | 
						|
        sent_message_id = self.send_stream_message(
 | 
						|
            sender=hamlet,
 | 
						|
            stream_name="Denmark",
 | 
						|
            topic_name="lunch",
 | 
						|
            content="I want pizza!",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # But if you want to verify the most recent message received
 | 
						|
        # by a user, there's a handy function for that.
 | 
						|
        iago_message = most_recent_message(iago)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Here we check that the message we sent is the last one that
 | 
						|
        # Iago received.  While we verify several properties of the
 | 
						|
        # last message, the most important to verify is the unique ID,
 | 
						|
        # since that protects us from bugs if this test were to be
 | 
						|
        # extended to send multiple similar messages.
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(iago_message.id, sent_message_id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(iago_message.sender_id, hamlet.id)
 | 
						|
        self.assert_message_stream_name(iago_message, "Denmark")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(iago_message.topic_name(), "lunch")
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(iago_message.content, "I want pizza!")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    def test_personal_message(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        sent_message_id = self.send_personal_message(
 | 
						|
            from_user=hamlet,
 | 
						|
            to_user=cordelia,
 | 
						|
            content="hello there!",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        cordelia_message = most_recent_message(cordelia)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.id, sent_message_id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.sender_id, hamlet.id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(cordelia_message.content, "hello there!")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestQueryCounts(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    def test_capturing_queries(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # It's a common pitfall in Django to accidentally perform
 | 
						|
        # database queries in a loop, due to lazy evaluation of
 | 
						|
        # foreign keys. We use the assert_database_query_count
 | 
						|
        # context manager to ensure our query count is predictable.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # When a test containing one of these query count assertions
 | 
						|
        # fails, we'll want to understand the new queries and whether
 | 
						|
        # they're necessary. You can investiate whether the changes
 | 
						|
        # are expected/sensible by comparing print(queries) between
 | 
						|
        # your branch and main.
 | 
						|
        hamlet = self.example_user("hamlet")
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        with self.assert_database_query_count(15):
 | 
						|
            self.send_personal_message(
 | 
						|
                from_user=hamlet,
 | 
						|
                to_user=cordelia,
 | 
						|
                content="hello there!",
 | 
						|
            )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestDevelopmentEmailsLog(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # The /emails/generate/ endpoint can be used to generate
 | 
						|
    # all sorts of emails. Those can be accessed at /emails/
 | 
						|
    # in development server. Let's test that here.
 | 
						|
    def test_generate_emails(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        # It is a common case where some functions that we test rely
 | 
						|
        # on a certain setting's value. You can test those under the
 | 
						|
        # context of a desired setting value as done below.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # The endpoint we're testing here rely on these settings:
 | 
						|
        #   * EMAIL_BACKEND: The backend class used to send emails.
 | 
						|
        #   * DEVELOPMENT_LOG_EMAILS: Whether to log emails sent.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # We use our assertLogs() helper to catch log entries,
 | 
						|
        # as you'll see below. Read more about assertLogs() at:
 | 
						|
        # https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertLogs
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # We use mock.patch to simulate _do_send_messages.
 | 
						|
        with (
 | 
						|
            self.settings(EMAIL_BACKEND="zproject.email_backends.EmailLogBackEnd"),
 | 
						|
            self.settings(DEVELOPMENT_LOG_EMAILS=True),
 | 
						|
            self.assertLogs(level="INFO") as info_log,
 | 
						|
            mock.patch(
 | 
						|
                "zproject.email_backends.EmailLogBackEnd._do_send_messages", lambda *args: 1
 | 
						|
            ),
 | 
						|
        ):
 | 
						|
            # Parts of this endpoint use transactions, and use
 | 
						|
            # transaction.on_commit to run code when the transaction
 | 
						|
            # commits.  Tests are run inside one big outer
 | 
						|
            # transaction, so those never get a chance to run unless
 | 
						|
            # we explicitly make a fake boundary to run them at; that
 | 
						|
            # is what captureOnCommitCallbacks does.
 | 
						|
            with self.captureOnCommitCallbacks(execute=True):
 | 
						|
                result = self.client_get(
 | 
						|
                    "/emails/generate/"
 | 
						|
                )  # Generates emails and redirects to /emails/
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
            # Verify redirect
 | 
						|
            self.assertEqual(result["Location"], "/emails/")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
            # The above call to /emails/generate/ creates the emails and
 | 
						|
            # logs the below line for every email.
 | 
						|
            expected_log_line = (
 | 
						|
                "INFO:root:Emails sent in development are available at http://testserver/emails"
 | 
						|
            )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
            # info_log.output is a list of all the log messages captured.
 | 
						|
            self.assertEqual(info_log.output, [expected_log_line] * 20)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
            # Now, lets actually go the URL the above call redirects to, i.e., /emails/
 | 
						|
            result = self.client_get(result["Location"])
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
            # assert_in_success_response() verifies that the content
 | 
						|
            # we received from client_get includes the strings we expect
 | 
						|
            self.assert_in_success_response(["All emails sent in the Zulip"], result)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestMocking(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    # Mocking, primarily used in testing, is a technique that allows you to
 | 
						|
    # replace methods or objects with fake entities.
 | 
						|
    #
 | 
						|
    # Mocking is generally used in situations where
 | 
						|
    # we want to avoid running original code for reasons
 | 
						|
    # like skipping HTTP requests, saving execution time,
 | 
						|
    # or simulating convenient return values.
 | 
						|
    #
 | 
						|
    # Learn more about mocking in-depth at:
 | 
						|
    # https://zulip.readthedocs.io/en/latest/testing/testing-with-django.html#testing-with-mocks
 | 
						|
    def test_wildcard_mentions(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        cordelia = self.example_user("cordelia")
 | 
						|
        realm = cordelia.realm
 | 
						|
        self.login_user(cordelia)
 | 
						|
        self.subscribe(cordelia, "test_stream")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Let's explicitly set the policy for sending wildcard
 | 
						|
        # mentions to a stream. If a stream has too many
 | 
						|
        # subscribers, we won't allow any users to spam the stream.
 | 
						|
        nobody_system_group = NamedUserGroup.objects.get(
 | 
						|
            name=SystemGroups.NOBODY, realm=realm, is_system_group=True
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        do_change_realm_permission_group_setting(
 | 
						|
            realm,
 | 
						|
            "can_mention_many_users_group",
 | 
						|
            nobody_system_group,
 | 
						|
            acting_user=None,
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # We will try the same message a couple times.
 | 
						|
        # Notice the content includes "@**all**".
 | 
						|
        all_mention = "@**all** test wildcard mention"
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # First, let's test the SAD PATH, where cordelia
 | 
						|
        # tries a wildcard method and gets rejected.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # Here we use both mock.patch to simulate a return value
 | 
						|
        # and assertRaisesRegex to verify our function raises
 | 
						|
        # an error.
 | 
						|
        with (
 | 
						|
            mock.patch(
 | 
						|
                "zerver.lib.message.num_subscribers_for_stream_id",
 | 
						|
                return_value=Realm.WILDCARD_MENTION_THRESHOLD + 1,
 | 
						|
            ),
 | 
						|
            self.assertRaisesRegex(
 | 
						|
                StreamWildcardMentionNotAllowedError,
 | 
						|
                "You do not have permission to use channel wildcard mentions in this channel.",
 | 
						|
            ),
 | 
						|
        ):
 | 
						|
            self.send_stream_message(
 | 
						|
                sender=cordelia,
 | 
						|
                stream_name="test_stream",
 | 
						|
                content=all_mention,
 | 
						|
            )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Verify the message was NOT sent.
 | 
						|
        message = most_recent_message(cordelia)
 | 
						|
        self.assertNotEqual(message.content, all_mention)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Now for the HAPPY PATH, we still mock the number of
 | 
						|
        # subscribers, but here we simulate that we are under
 | 
						|
        # the limit.  We expect cordelia's message to go through.
 | 
						|
        with mock.patch(
 | 
						|
            "zerver.lib.message.num_subscribers_for_stream_id",
 | 
						|
            return_value=Realm.WILDCARD_MENTION_THRESHOLD - 1,
 | 
						|
        ):
 | 
						|
            self.send_stream_message(
 | 
						|
                sender=cordelia,
 | 
						|
                stream_name="test_stream",
 | 
						|
                content=all_mention,
 | 
						|
            )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Verify the message WAS sent.
 | 
						|
        message = most_recent_message(cordelia)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(message.content, all_mention)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
class TestTimeTravel(ZulipTestCase):
 | 
						|
    def test_edit_message(self) -> None:
 | 
						|
        """
 | 
						|
        Verify if the time limit imposed on message editing is working correctly.
 | 
						|
        """
 | 
						|
        iago = self.example_user("iago")
 | 
						|
        self.login("iago")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Set limit to edit message content.
 | 
						|
        MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT = 5 * 60  # 5 minutes
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_patch(
 | 
						|
            "/json/realm",
 | 
						|
            {
 | 
						|
                "allow_message_editing": "true",
 | 
						|
                "message_content_edit_limit_seconds": MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT,
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        sent_message_id = self.send_stream_message(
 | 
						|
            iago,
 | 
						|
            "Scotland",
 | 
						|
            topic_name="lunch",
 | 
						|
            content="I want pizza!",
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
        message_sent_time = timezone_now()
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Verify message sent.
 | 
						|
        message = most_recent_message(iago)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want pizza!")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Edit message content now. This should work as we're editing
 | 
						|
        # it immediately after sending i.e., before the limit exceeds.
 | 
						|
        result = self.client_patch(
 | 
						|
            f"/json/messages/{sent_message_id}", {"content": "I want burger!"}
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
        self.assert_json_success(result)
 | 
						|
        message = most_recent_message(iago)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
 | 
						|
        self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want burger!")
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Now that we tested message editing works within the limit,
 | 
						|
        # we want to verify it doesn't work beyond the limit.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # First, calculate the time we want to travel to, adding
 | 
						|
        # a little buffer of 100 seconds beyond the limit.
 | 
						|
        time_beyond_edit_limit = message_sent_time + timedelta(
 | 
						|
            seconds=MESSAGE_CONTENT_EDIT_LIMIT + 100
 | 
						|
        )
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
        # Now use time_machine.travel to simulate that we are in the future.
 | 
						|
        #
 | 
						|
        # See https://pypi.org/project/time-machine/ for more info.
 | 
						|
        with time_machine.travel(time_beyond_edit_limit, tick=False):
 | 
						|
            result = self.client_patch(
 | 
						|
                f"/json/messages/{sent_message_id}", {"content": "I actually want pizza."}
 | 
						|
            )
 | 
						|
            self.assert_json_error(result, msg="The time limit for editing this message has passed")
 | 
						|
            message = most_recent_message(iago)
 | 
						|
            self.assertEqual(message.id, sent_message_id)
 | 
						|
            self.assertEqual(message.content, "I want burger!")
 |