mirror of
https://github.com/zulip/zulip.git
synced 2025-11-04 05:53:43 +00:00
840cf4b885
mock is just a backport of the standard library’s unittest.mock now. The SAMLAuthBackendTest change is needed because MagicMock.call_args.args wasn’t introduced until Python 3.8 (https://bugs.python.org/issue21269). The PROVISION_VERSION bump is skipped because mock is still an indirect dev requirement via moto. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>
121 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
121 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
from unittest import mock
|
|
from unittest import TestCase
|
|
|
|
from scripts.lib.check_rabbitmq_queue import (
|
|
analyze_queue_stats,
|
|
OK,
|
|
WARNING,
|
|
CRITICAL,
|
|
UNKNOWN,
|
|
)
|
|
import time
|
|
|
|
class AnalyzeQueueStatsTests(TestCase):
|
|
def test_no_stats_available(self) -> None:
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {}, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], UNKNOWN)
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_stuck(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Last update > 5 minutes ago and there's events in the queue.
|
|
|
|
In theory, we could be having bad luck with a race where in
|
|
the last (event_handing_time * 50) a burst was added, but it's
|
|
unlikely and shouldn't fail 2 in a row for Nagios anyway.
|
|
"""
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time() - 301}, 100)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], CRITICAL)
|
|
self.assertIn('queue appears to be stuck', result['message'])
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_just_started(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
We just started processing a burst of events, and haven't processed enough
|
|
to log productivity statistics yet.
|
|
"""
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 10000,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': None}, 10000)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], OK)
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_normal(self) -> None:
|
|
"""10000 events and each takes a second => it'll take a long time to empty."""
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 10000,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 10000,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 10000)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], CRITICAL)
|
|
self.assertIn('clearing the backlog', result['message'])
|
|
|
|
# If we're doing 10K/sec, it's OK.
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 10000,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 10000,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 0.0001}, 10000)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], OK)
|
|
|
|
# Verify logic around whether it'll take MAX_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_NORMAL to clear queue.
|
|
with mock.patch.dict('scripts.lib.check_rabbitmq_queue.MAX_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_NORMAL',
|
|
{'name': 10}):
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 11,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 10000,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 11)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], WARNING)
|
|
self.assertIn('clearing the backlog', result['message'])
|
|
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 9,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 10000,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 9)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], OK)
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_burst(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Test logic for just after a large number of events were added
|
|
to an empty queue. Happens routinely for digest emails, for example."""
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 10000,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 1,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 10000)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], CRITICAL)
|
|
self.assertIn('clearing the burst', result['message'])
|
|
|
|
# verify logic around MAX_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_FOR_BURSTS.
|
|
with mock.patch.dict('scripts.lib.check_rabbitmq_queue.MAX_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_FOR_BURSTS',
|
|
{'name': 10}):
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 11,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 1,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 11)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], WARNING)
|
|
self.assertIn('clearing the burst', result['message'])
|
|
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 9,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': time.time() - 1,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 9)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], OK)
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_burst_long_time_to_clear_allowed(self) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
For a queue that is allowed > 300s to clear a burst of events,
|
|
we need to verify that the checker will not stop categorizing this as a burst
|
|
while the worker is still processing the events, within the allowed time limit.
|
|
"""
|
|
start_time = time.time()
|
|
with mock.patch.dict('scripts.lib.check_rabbitmq_queue.CRITICAL_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_FOR_BURSTS',
|
|
{'name': 600}), \
|
|
mock.patch.dict('scripts.lib.check_rabbitmq_queue.MAX_SECONDS_TO_CLEAR_FOR_BURSTS',
|
|
{'name': 600}):
|
|
with mock.patch('time.time', return_value=start_time + 599):
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 599,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': start_time,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 599)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], OK)
|
|
|
|
with mock.patch('time.time', return_value=start_time + 601):
|
|
result = analyze_queue_stats('name', {'update_time': time.time(),
|
|
'current_queue_size': 599,
|
|
'queue_last_emptied_timestamp': start_time,
|
|
'recent_average_consume_time': 1}, 599)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result['status'], CRITICAL)
|