Compare commits

...

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gerrit User 1000276
fed39a2c7b Update patch set 2
Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 2
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000276 \u003c1000276@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000276\u003e replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000010 \u003c1000010@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000276\u003e replied on the change"}
2025-10-22 20:38:14 +00:00
Gerrit User 1000276
fad53f3b74 Create patch set 2
Uploaded patch set 2: Commit message was updated.

Copied Votes:
* Verified-1 (copy condition: "changekind:NO_CHANGE OR **changekind:NO_CODE_CHANGE**")

Outdated Votes:
* Code-Review+1 (copy condition: "changekind:NO_CHANGE OR changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN")


Patch-set: 2
Subject: trx: Fix tx/rx-sps 4 for USRP1 devices
Commit: 33445944de
Tag: autogenerated:gerrit:newPatchSet
Groups: 33445944de
Copied-Label: Verified=-1, 918ae691c35dd883520c93e201ac0c78042cf1ec Gerrit User 1000002 <1000002@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326>:"jenkins"
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000161 \u003c1000161@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"Vote got outdated and was removed: Code-Review+1"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000004 \u003c1000004@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"Vote got outdated and was removed: Code-Review+1"}
2025-10-22 20:33:53 +00:00
Gerrit User 1000010
b83815a78e Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 1
CC: Gerrit User 1000010 <1000010@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326>
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000276 \u003c1000276@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000010\u003e replied on the change"}
2025-10-22 18:27:47 +00:00
Gerrit User 1000276
a4d2513b41 Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 1
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000276 \u003c1000276@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000276\u003e replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000004 \u003c1000004@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1000276\u003e replied on the change"}
2025-10-22 16:22:33 +00:00

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,40 @@
{
"comments": [
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "a4df052b_0edaea13",
"filename": "/COMMIT_MSG",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 9,
"author": {
"id": 1000010
},
"writtenOn": "2025-10-22T18:27:47Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Please adjust the commit message formatting to avoid very long lines: wrap it to about 72 characters or so.",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "1b761054_739198b3",
"filename": "/COMMIT_MSG",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 9,
"author": {
"id": 1000276
},
"writtenOn": "2025-10-22T20:38:14Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "got it, new commit message in patchset 2",
"parentUuid": "a4df052b_0edaea13",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
@@ -33,6 +68,60 @@
"message": "would someone be as kind as to address the linter complaints, this way we can get a V+1 for this patch, whose absence (V-1) is currently blocking the merge of this patch",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "6b5d71aa_7e55d8e7",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1000276
},
"writtenOn": "2025-10-22T16:22:33Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "should I fix it as the linter is suggesting? The multi-line function call format it\u0027s complaining about is used a couple lines down (Line 126, https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/41231/1/Transceiver52M/device/usrp1/USRPDevice.cpp#126) so I don\u0027t know if there\u0027s an issue with consistency",
"parentUuid": "47282408_079bd539",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "5c97b1cc_7aecafe6",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1000010
},
"writtenOn": "2025-10-22T18:27:47Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "You\u0027re changing the existing code, which is not properly formatted in the first place.\nSo I believe we can bypass the linter here. I can do that when the commit message is fixed.",
"parentUuid": "6b5d71aa_7e55d8e7",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "65472603_94340dfd",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1000276
},
"writtenOn": "2025-10-22T20:38:14Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Done",
"parentUuid": "5c97b1cc_7aecafe6",
"revId": "063d939744dd201c309059d5d4be13ac0f8c3ce7",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
}
]
}