Lists that were followed by a paragraph (i.e. our p+ul, p+ol CSS rule)
in messages had negative top margin of -3px. Adjusting the margin
here is important, because the default styling would result in an
excessive gap that made bulleted lists weirdly far from the previous
paragraph. See #12113 for background.
However, the -3px negative margin was so large that it reduced spaces
between paragraph and lists, such that there was too little visible
separation between the two. We fix this by going with a 0px
margin-top instead.
This has been tested for various structures of messages:
1. text + bulleted list
2. bulleted list + unbulleted list(or two lists)
3. only list.
And it looks good in all cases.
Fixes#17284.
The code blocks and response blocks had small and unreadable font,
because they were using the bootstrap defaults without adjustment for
the size of content on the rest of the page. Fixes part of
zulip#15967.
This both is better copy and also cleared for translators, who in
languages with gendered nouns don't need to guess what gender to use
for "one" without context.
This bug was caught thanks to the earlier commit which
introduces the "Restart tutorial" feature. To reproduce
the bug,
1. Restart tutorial
2. Click "Got it!" on the intro_reply hotspot
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2
The hotspot for intro_reply won't disappear the second
time around and the intro_stream hotspot would be displayed
simultaneously.
The reason for this was the intro_reply's "Got it!"
button codepath never removing the item completely from
the DOM. This would then conflict with the new intro_reply
hotspot which would get assigned a different 'id'.
Add new rest api endpoint GET users/{email} for looking up a user by
email, which is useful especially for corporate API applications that
might already have a user's email address.
Fixes#14302.
It looks like this ritual was born when a type comment wasn’t working
because it was mistyped without the colon.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <anders@zulip.com>'
This finds three sets of related settings to extract from the
"Miscellaneous" settings section:
- Service configuration (PostgreSQL, RabbitMQ, Redis, Memcached)
- Previews (image, URL, and Twitter)
- Logging and error reporting
Adds a "unstar messages in topic foo" option to the topic sidebar
popover, if there are any starred messages in that topic, known
to the frontend.
Altered existing "unstar all messages" confirmation modal to mention
the topic name, in the case that it was opened by the topic sidebar
codepath.
This is just a v1, and will not unstar old messages from that
topic, if they have not been fetched by the frontend.
Fixes#12194
Co-authored-by: Abhijeet Bodas <abhijeetbodas2001@gmail.com>
A few internal fields used for tracking which types of notifications
have already been sent for a given message, like `hander_id` and the
`push_notified` bundle of fields were being incorrectly included in
message events delivered to clients clients.
One could argue these fields might be useful hints to clients, but
because notifications can be triggered later on via
`missedmessage_hook`, they have no useful purpose in the API.
This commit move these extended event field on a `internal_data`
object within the event object, and delete this field in `contents()`
for call points that would serve data to clients.
Tweaked by tabbott to provide a cleaner interface.
We're not bumping API_FEATURE_LEVEL because these fields have always
been documented as being present only due to a bug, so no clients
should be expecting or relying on them.
Fixes: #15947.
This splits the one big `run_test` block into
add/edit/delete parts, for better clarity.
This also removes the `with_field` calls and
uses the override style instead, which is
preferred because it makes sure the stubbed
function is actually called.
This commit replaces `with_field` calls to
use the override style instead.
`override` is preferred since it makes sure
the stubbed function is actually called,
while `with_field` doesn't, which makes it
hard to spot dead code.
This document is mainly an answer to a set of questions other
developers have been asking about Zulip's architecture and scalability
design. It's intended for developers working on Zulip, to help with
thinking about where to prioritize further efforts to optimize
scalability.
This commit replaces all `with_stub` calls and
explicitly calls `make_stub` instead.
The `with_stub` helper does not add much clarity
hence we now use scoped stub objects instead.
This de-indents some blocks where scoping isn't
required, for example when there is a single
stub object inside a `run_test` function.
With this change, we also need to explicitly
assert `num_calls`.
