This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a BitBucket integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gogs integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a GitHub integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/PR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
This is a follow-up in response to Tim's comments on #9951.
In instances where all messages from a Gitlab integration are
grouped under one user specified topic (specified in the URL), we
should include the title of the issue/MR in the message body, since
the availability of a user-specified topic precludes us from
including it in the topic itself (which was the default behaviour).
Implement this function in 'bulk_import_model'
and 'update_model_ids'.
This lets us save on redundant-feeling arguments in these
frequently-called helper functions.
This deletes the unused Subscription.notifications field and removes
it from some testing and analytics code (which should not have been
using it in the first place).
Fixes#10042.
One of the code examples for GET /users was using the raw call_endpoint
method from our Python bindings, rather than get_members, which has been
specifically designed to interact with this endpoint.
Now all the examples here use the appropiate method.
Whenever a parameter for an endpoint in our REST API has a default
value, it is displayed under the "Description" section of the
arguments table in the docs.
This way, we don't need to explicitly indicate the default values in the
description, thus avoiding duplicate information in the OpenAPI source.
We use these new functions in the message compose typeahead so that they
can also be used in a PM recipients typeahead with both people and user
groups.
We now render the "skin" part of "Stream Settings" before
adding in the actual streams. The new function
populate_stream_settings_left_panel() takes care of adding
the streams. It uses a new template called
`subscriptions.handlebars`.
Splitting out this function will give us more flexibility
for various improvements.
First, we can decide to render the list after we open the
overlay, just to avoid the problem that users don't know why
the modal's opening. (And we could add a loader spinner as
needed.)
Second, we can improve our filter features so that we do
filtering in the data instead of moving DOM rows around,
which is expensive.
Third, we can eventually introduce progressive rendering.
Finally, having the function broken out will make profiling
more precise about where bottlenecks exist.
This has the benefit that we now get the usual data about the
user/request/etc. in error emails related to bugdown exceptions;
previously we were just getting the traceback in the emails (since our
`mail_admins` template was very simple) and no other debugging
details.
Comments tweaked by tabbott to help make clear exactly what's going on
here, since it's a little subtle and a little hacky.
Fixes#8843.
Fixes#10059.
In 66df4e3e84,
`display: inline-flex` was added to `.pill-container` but
`flex-wrap: wrap` was missing which forced overflow pills to be on
one line and made the pill text overflow vertically. This was not
observed in composebox pills as `.pm_recipient .pill-container`
already had a `flex-wrap: wrap` rule which has been removed in this
commit to avoid duplication.
We were passing this in before, but having it as
a data member reinforces the idea that we'll want
this to be a first-class concept in the list, since
we depend on ordering for various things.
We now keep track of keys in buddy_list.js, so that
when we insert/remove items, we no longer need to
traverse all the DOM. Instead, we just find out
which position in the list we need to insert the
key in (where "key" is "user_id") and then find
the relevant DOM node directly and insert the new
HTML before that node. (And of course we still
account for the "append" case.)
There's a little more bookkeeping to make this
happen, but it should help reduce some code in
upcoming commits and pave the way toward
progressive rendering optimizations.
This commit should produce a minor speedup
for activity-related events that go through
buddy_list.insert_or_move(), since we are
not traversing the DOM to find insertion points
any more.
This will be useful for lazy rendering, where our
buddy_list widget already knows the keys (aka "userids")
it wants to render as you start scrolling them into
view.
