This now adds you to a special `tutorial-username` when you begin,
we send tutorial messages there, and we remove you from it when
you're done.
(imported from commit a93a90b9347a4f72536e96331ddfd1d47727ce71)
But only allow them to send to tutorial-<<your username>>.
The idea being that this helps reduce potential abuse from this JSON
call. (Because otherwise, anyone could call into this endpoint and
have the tutorial bot send random messages to random peoples's
streams.)
(imported from commit 471d4348d7ad43858b5df240e4f1dceba006aab6)
Previously, we blurred all input/text boxes, including e.g. the search
box. This probably won't impact normal operation, but this can be a
problem for our automated frontend tests which tend to have different
timing than real life.
(imported from commit ea84312bea2aae99d51b48cede0746e7a5b6e76e)
We had a bug where if the selected message had the same subject as the
target message, but a different stream, narrowing by subject would
narrow to that subject plus the selected message's stream rather than
the target message's stream.
(imported from commit 4b196342318a06d8aeea46bf05e3d7416ecb6c5b)
Previously if you narrowed to
"pm-with:wdaher@humbughq.com,jbarnold@humbughq.com", you'd always get
no results because our filter was comparing your query against
message.reply_to, which is sorted in alphabetical order.
(imported from commit 40dc78640f3b010f11312176cfcf3c331fdf3337)
The most expensive part of adding the display time to messages is
calling time.toLocaleDateString() and time.toLocaleTimeString().
Most of the time, this information never gets seen, so we now delay
calculating it until just before the user would see it. This cuts
the time to render a chunk of messages from >1s to ~200ms.
(imported from commit 6167e7a8e1c3b4ca77471fa346292be4ffa67ec8)
Adding the display times to messages is very expensive (> 1s for 400
messages in Chrome on my machine). This commit doesn't directly
address that issue, but does mitigate its affects on scrolling speed
when rendering the next chunk of the message list. After this
commit, rendering a portion of the message list for the second time
only takes ~300ms.
(imported from commit b22badb5dcce69be297f6403b1cb40950e46376e)
Long-term we probably want to pick the render window size and
re-render threshold based on the user's window height instead of
arbitrarily.
When we re-render we probably also want to ensure that the newly
selected message appears in the same location as it would have
before the re-render.
(imported from commit f044b7f2200822e8e6e8dba7108d087a69016134)
One of Matt Goldstein's comments is that we often make you look
like you're not at your computer, even when you are, just because
you haven't checked Humbug for a while.
While it's important to have this be accurate, right now I think
we err on the side of showing you as not present. So I increased
some of the timeouts in an attempt to fix that.
(imported from commit 9fd8f432e6684ec1b33d1d932f37caa99c627959)
This might need to change after we merge zev's message list branch, but
it fixes the bug and performs well and isn't a lot of code.
And it has the nice property that it'll only fade messages within the
neighbors range, so there's no need to update the unfading code to
support this.
(imported from commit c562d7335bc5635c960321e1451e4ba0f4452ee9)
To be fully responsive, we can basically never specify the width of
our container in a fixed number of pixels; otherwise we'll run into
the situation where there's an inordinate amount of wasted space on
our left and right.
So everything needs to change from, e.g. row to row-fluid,
and that has a whole cascading series of changes that that implies.
(imported from commit 7e2771d916f429548c65c0a00fc4c11397054656)
Previously we defaulted to current_msg_list.selected_id, which was
fine if you were narrowing from the home view, but if you navigated to
a narrow with no messages in it and then clicked something in the left
panel or used the search bar, it wouldn't work.
Fixes trac: #870.
(imported from commit 5ee480d8d2b1fb300fccbe75e04135d977a1fc07)
The first change might somewhat address users asking "does it matter
which one I click on?" by not being specific that one should click on
_this message_.
The latter I think addresses a small confusion I've seen where people
try try to hit tab before starting a reply.
(imported from commit 708acdf4d4c80713795b96b1a59d681a88604670)
This is the fix for https://trac.humbughq.com/ticket/958 (Narrowing
moves the pointer) proposed by jhurwitz. Currently on master,
narrowing can cause you to end up wildly out of place.
This branch is not a perfect fix -- you do end up with the pointer on
the expected message after the narrow, but that message is centered on
the screen; better would be for that message to not move at all.
(imported from commit b89e4e2c896add20eceb609db46c46dc025fdce2)
In Safari only, if you narrow to something and scroll all the way back
up to the top and then unnarrow, your position actually remains all
the way at the top!
We explicitly call a "scroll_to_selected" as the final step of
deactivating a narrow, which brings this message into view.
This doesn't seem to be an issue on Chrome and Firefox, but I'm not
quite sure why; something about the sequence of events.
(imported from commit fc73640351be03c02eb2f3c8a23de3327723f002)
