I think this is more pythonic?
We could also get rid of LoggingCountStats altogether, since it's now just a
special case of CountStat (is_logging == data_collector.pull_function is None).
But I think it's nice to keep the distinction since they behave so differently.
Removes the circular dependency of CountStat containing a DataCollector, and
DataCollector containing a function that takes a CountStat as an argument.
This will allow us to appropriately generalize CountStat to include
LoggingCountStat and CustomPullCountStat. It'll also make life easier when
we introduce DependentCountStat.
The previous zerver_* names were unwieldy and not very readable. This also
puts more of the useful information in one place; in particular, makes it
easier to skim a CountStat declaration and see if we're collecting it at a
user/stream granularity or a realm granularity.
It turned out to not be that useful once we added subgroup. The previous
design of the CountStat object also assumed more reuseability of the *_query
strings than what ended up happening.
The filter_args also had some carrying costs:
* It's hard to be confident that filter_args other than the ones explicitly
in our tests would have had expected behavior.
* The filter_args/join_args system is the most complex part of the CountStat
object, and makes understanding the *_query strings unnecessarily
difficult for a new contributor.
Groundwork for allowing stats like "Monthly Active Users".
CountStat.interval is no longer as clean a value as before, so removed it
from views.get_chart_data. It wasn't being used by the frontend anyway.
Removing interval from logger calls in counts.py is not a big loss since we
now include the frequency (which is typically also the interval) in
CountStat.property.
count_message_type_by_user_query is in a different format (no WHERE clause)
from the rest since I'm having a hard time reasoning about how that would
interact with the LEFT JOIN, especially given that there are %(join_args)s.
Analytics database tables are getting big, and so we're likely moving to a
model where ~all stats are day stats, and we keep hourly stats only for the
last N days.
Also changed the name because:
* messages_sent_* suggests the counts (summed over subgroup) should be the
same as the other messages_sent stats, but they are different (these don't
include PMs).
* messages_sent_by_stream:is_bot:day is longer than 32 characters, the max
allowable length for a BaseCount.property.
Includes a database migration to remove the old stat from the analytics
tables.
Having both messages_sent:hour and messages_sent:is_bot:day is confusing,
since a single messages_sent:is_bot:hour would have a superset of the
information and take less total space. This commit and its parent together
replace the two stats with a single messages_sent:is_bot:hour.
Includes a database migration. The interval field was originally there to
facilitate time aggregation (e.g. aggregate_hour_to_day), but we now do such
aggregations in views code or in the frontend.
A few reasons:
* Our two other subgroup'd message stats in UserCount are at CountStat.DAY
frequency (messages_sent:is_bot and messages_sent:message_type).
* Keeping this stat at hourly frequency would likely double the size of our
analytics table, given the current stats. (Counterpoint: if there are
roughly as many active streams as active users, and we keep
messages_sent_to_stream:is_bot at hourly frequency, then maybe this stat
is only a 30% or 50% increase).
* We're currently only showing this on the frontend as a pie chart anyway.
Previously, this function seemed ambivalent about whether it was generating
a series of abstract data points or a series of data points that would
correspond to times. Switch firmly to the latter, so e.g. if the frequency
changes, so will the length of the output sequence.
Fixes an error in the definition of
COUNT_STATS['messages_sent_to_stream:is_bot']. The CountStat needs a
group_by argument since it is supposed to group by UserProfile.is_bot.
This query counts the number of messages each user has sent, subgroup'd by
whether the message was a private_message (PM or sent to a huddle), sent to
a 'private_stream', or sent to a 'public_stream'.
We need to join on zerver_stream to find out whether stream messages were
sent to public streams or private streams, but it needs to be a LEFT JOIN
rather than a JOIN so that we preserve the messages sent to non-streams.
We were updating FillState with FillState.objects.filter(..).update(..),
which does not update the last_modified field (which has auto_now=True).
The correct incantation is the save() method of the actual FillState
object.
